Also it's flat out wrong logic on the body size argument. Meaning, you can't say a guy is 6'2 210 to justify why a guy is a good draft pick. That's using reverse logic. As an overly simplistic example, you can't just say a ball player will be great just because they're of a certain demographic. Even though one could use the same stupid logic and say on average or in aggregate across a sample size of thousands, that most successful ball players are of a certain demographic. Do you see why this logic makes zero sense? The argument to draft a guy should be based first on whether they can actually do the job. In the case of a WR, ask can they literally run routes to get open against a live NFL CB? Can they run multiple routes to be a 3down player, get open, and catch the ball. Not what their 3cone is or if they are the right height and weight. The idiocy around backwards-justifying draft picks based on selecting a guy based on body type or combine 3cone is exactly how we ended up with NKeal Harry, Aaron Dobson, and Chad Jackson total BUSTS. There are a vast majority of thousands of players who 'fit' the body type and flame out because that's not what makes a good player or not.