You know, this article really got under my skin due to the author framing certain things...
There were rumors that Gonzales resigned with a Post-it note on Meyer’s desk.
“I never left a Post-it note,” Gonzales said.
So, the authors simply cites "rumors," and then quotes Gonzales denying it? That's nonsense. By ordering it in that fashion you've already placed a burden of guilt in the reader's mind (based on "rumors" over a post-it, mind you) and directly following it with a denial almost makes it look worse.
Spikes, sources said, failed a drug test at Florida and was suspended four games during his rookie season with the Patriots for using performance enhancing drugs.
Adderall? Adderall is a PED? C'mon.
“I told (Meyer) I was on track to graduate, I wasn’t a problem and I did everything I was supposed to do—I just had a knee injury,” Thomas said. “I told them I wasn’t leaving, and if they tried to force me to leave, I was going to tell everyone everything."
Again, the author's use of quotes places an implied burden of blame on Meyer. The quote is about *IF* Thomas would ever be "forced" to move on. That's a big if. Cause he wasn't "forced." That's simply implied by the quote. A quote that uses the word "if" because it never actually happened. Of course, using the quote in that fashion creates that impression in the reader's mind...despite it not happening.
Rather, Thomas was injury prone student-athlete on scholarship and told that he simply wasn't going to be in their plans anymore for football and was advised to try to play at a different school...which he later did. So...am I supposed to think this is unreasonable? He's on scholarship for sports. Yet, he can't play that sport. So the coach, instead, wants to use that scholarship on another student-athlete. Yet, Thomas is still allowed to stay at Florida, on scholarship too, but he just simply cannot play football due to a medical hardship waiver which Thomas himself agreed to sign. Huh? Am I actually supposed to think this is bad? Sounds pretty fair, really.
What's even worse is that the author tries to frame this as being "ruthless" roster management, and how Thomas will be the only one who isn't afraid to "speak out" against Meyer (um, about
*what* exactly?). Really? Cause if that's the case, then I'd just as easily call this "ruthless" journalism. Framing events to create an impression over rumors and over events *if* it could have happened.