SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Comment deletedThe burning question is was Bob generally aware of the nature of the spa?
The investigation fair predates the Epstein decision.How much was this sting motivated by the need for law enforcement to look like they are not ignoring such crimes after Epstein skated?
His argument will be that he paid for a massage and it will be up to the prosecution to prove anything else. Sex on video is not proof of a financial transaction.
Look it. The sign didn't say "Free Massage" did it? I dont understand you guys here that find that he paid money at the desk so convincing. I think they're going to need a lot more than that. Maybe they have it but the fact he paid money doesn't do it unless they also have the audio
I wish this was true.I’ve got an idea this other “big name” they’ve not released is goodell. I’ve heard rumors
I’ve been researching weather or not we could lose draft picks but it seems clear that it’s not really possible. However, goodell has that one clause where he could do basically anything.
Could goodell take picks?
My bad. Evidently, I'm not privy to the inside information. Quite honestly, I could care less what happens to Kraft. OTH, I'm interested in what happens to the sex slave, which was exposed.I'll elaborate, you can't see the forest for the trees.
That was true of Spygate too, and it didn't stop them. But at least you can make an argument that this has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with the Patriots, and that might help the league keep its fangs to itself.I do not see reason at all to mention draft picks on this matter...
Legally (and many would argue that morally as well), the law is built on the concept of foreseeable risks. In other words, if you walk into a run and tug parlor, a reasonable person would be taking a risk that s/he is engaging in illegal prostitution, but a reasonable person would not likely (and the actual charge against Kraft speaks to this) know they are also engaging in, supporting, or committing a higher crime involving human trafficking.
Does anyone know if the records get destroyed with this type of misdemeanor if the perp pleads guilty and completes his sentence? It may be the least humiliating way out for Kraft if so.
Stop following Sharks of Vegas on Twitter.I’ve got an idea this other “big name” they’ve not released is goodell. I’ve heard rumors
My thoughts.
#1 This is first and foremost the fault of every voter in the USA. For years we have refused to change the laws and for years it has led to bad outcomes. When you keep prostitution illegal things like human trafficking or under age prostitution become more common and harder to control. Not to mention the spread of disease and the abuse of pimps. This has gone on way too long. Just make it legal, control it, tax it and be done with it.
#2 Kraft shouldn't have gone to that particular place. While the owner of a brothel or a massage parlor will no doubt always try to convince clients who are curious that the ladies are willing. Most people know better than to ask as they could lead to denial of service or an angry outburst by the pimps/providers. There is no way Kraft should have known or would have been told of such women were willing or not at such a location. Best to avoid them for moral reasons. He could have easily paid for a high end escort who he knew was on the up and up. Still. Bad judgement doesn't mean a bad person.
#3 The police didn't do a good job here. They had a case on all these place for months. Yet they allowed the service to continue and continue. What were they waiting for? Why let it go on? Was it just to up the arrest numbers on Johns? If so that is a pretty crappy reason. I think questions should be asked about the investigation.