- Joined
- Mar 12, 2012
- Messages
- 10,923
- Reaction score
- 19,271
If by mediocre you mean average, the problem is that pretty much all the QBs that are in the top half of most people's ranking are already locked into their roles on their teams, or will take some significant draft capital to get their teams to part with them, whereas Cousins will 'merely' take cash.My question on Kirk Cousins is why? He has never shown himself to be anything other than mediocre. The Patriots can't be the only team that knows how to develop QBs. If I was one of these teams, I would much rather scout the college ranks and bring in the best guy rather than pay mega-millions to one of these retreads.
Look at how much money Brock Osweiler got, and he had next to no tape on him. Cousins has three years as a starter. As some basis for comparison, PFF ( NFL QB Rankings by PFF grade after Week 16 | NFL Analysis | Pro Football Focus ) says he's tied for 15th best QB. DEN now has Osweiler again and he's last. Signing a check to get a guy that moves you from last to mediocre is worth a lot. Of course good QB play requires good line play and good receiver play etc so it's not all on the QB, but still, it is worth a lot to get someone capable of doing the job.
Another way to look at it is to notice that Cousins has a better PFF rating than Derek Carr, Andy Dalton, Cam Newton, Joe Flacco, Eli Manning, etc, all of whom have are making serious money.
The draft is a total crap shoot. You might end up with the next Wentz or you might end up with the next bust.
As for developing them, the Pats are far above average but then again the overall batting average isn't great. Sure we have TB and JG to point to, but a lot of relatively mediocre QBs like Mallet or Cassel or (IMO) Brisette.
TL;DR: In the NFL, even mediocre QBs get paid!
Last edited: