Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.
I can see trading Gilmore, but not if they are bringing Garrapolo back. If Newton or another scrub is QB then they won’t be a contender, so getting a pick for a player whose contract is up soon makes sense, but the point of bringing Garrapolo back is to contend, in which case you strengthen your roster, you don’t deplete it.
Gilmore will be demanding more money, BB likes to trade players a year before they drop off. It's a contract year, makes sense to trade Gilmore.
A contract year is historically the year you keep them.
Gilmore held out until he got a raise last season, he will do it again. And that cap hit for other teams, they might be willing to pay more.
I doubt he plays for us if we do that. Best to try to trade him. My own take is just extend him for a couple of more years. I don't understand why we want to move off of him. He is our only elite player.
www.nbcsports.com
www.si.com
| Rk | Year | G# | Date | Age | Tm | Opp | Result | Cmp | Att | Cmp% | Yds | TD | Int | Rate | Y/A | AY/A | Att | Yds | Y/A | TD | Notes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 6 | 2017-10-15 | 23-056 | CHI | @ | BAL | W 27-24 | 8 | 16 | 50.00 | 113 | 1 | 0 | 94.0 | 7.06 | 8.31 | 4 | 32 | 8.00 | 0 | GWD |
| 2 | 2018 | 3 | 2018-09-23 | 24-034 | CHI | @ | ARI | W 16-14 | 24 | 35 | 68.57 | 220 | 0 | 1 | 73.5 | 6.29 | 5.00 | 2 | 8 | 4.00 | 0 | 4QC / GWD |
| 3 | 2018 | 14 | 2018-12-16 | 24-118 | CHI | GNB | W 24-17 | 20 | 28 | 71.43 | 235 | 2 | 0 | 120.4 | 8.39 | 9.82 | 3 | 16 | 5.33 | 0 | GWD | |
| 4 | 2019 | 2 | 2019-09-15 | 25-026 | CHI | @ | DEN | W 16-14 | 16 | 27 | 59.26 | 120 | 0 | 0 | 70.0 | 4.44 | 4.44 | 1 | 8 | 8.00 | 0 | 4QC / GWD |
| 5 | 2019 | 12 | 2019-11-28 | 25-100 | CHI | @ | DET | W 24-20 | 29 | 38 | 76.32 | 338 | 3 | 1 | 118.1 | 8.89 | 9.29 | 4 | 4 | 1.00 | 0 | 4QC / GWD |
| 6 | 2019 | 16 | 2019-12-29 | 25-131 | CHI | @ | MIN | W 21-19 | 26 | 37 | 70.27 | 207 | 0 | 0 | 84.0 | 5.59 | 5.59 | 2 | 1 | 0.50 | 0 | 4QC / GWD |
| 7 | 2020 | 1 | 2020-09-13 | 26-024 | CHI | @ | DET | W 27-23 | 20 | 36 | 55.56 | 242 | 3 | 0 | 104.2 | 6.72 | 8.39 | 3 | 26 | 8.67 | 0 | 4QC / GWD |
So they should bring in a QB good enough to be a contender and then get rid of their best defensive player? That makes no sense to me. Now if Brissett or Newton are the QB then it makes complete sense.
You read it wrong. It would be niners gets Gilmore, pats get niners 2nd and Jimmy g
He did not hold out.
What’s he going to do? Sit out not get paid, get a year older and still be under the same contract in 2022? That makes no sense.
The 49ers can't afford to pay $17 million for a backup to Jimmy G who makes $26.4 million. This is a clear sign they're considering cutting Garropolo and drafting a rookie QB to sit behind Bridgewater for a year or two, They can get both for Garoppolo's 2021 salary.
Still not interested, even though that's a better trade. Jimmy went out his 2nd game with the Pats and has missed half his games with the 49rs. I would rather have Gilmore and Cousins level play at QB.
With regards to the 49ers cap situation, keep an eye on Dee Ford.
They need to cut bait on that guy.
Heh. Sounds just good enough for 8-8. Really, though, if they were going to trade Gilmore, the time to do it was last year. It was pretty clear that this team was cheeks by the trade deadline. If they’re going to try to be competitive, trading him this season makes no sense at all. Especially for a QB like JAG who is basically a lock to miss roughly half the games the team will play.
9ers have a lot of free agents. They only have about 30 players under contract that really are legit players.
There's an injury issue there.
