he did this to the woman in 2012. Not his rookie year. And given what Cleeland said about him his rookie year, what Haslett and several other Rams said about him, the Spanguolo stuff, even his nebraska teammate who was on the Rams, Incognito did not behave typically as a rookie. People describe him as deranged in that period.
Read it again. He put a golf club into her (clothed vagina) on the golf course. They were not having consensual sex. My god, please read it again. Holy cow.
Sweet Jesus. I need to talk in short bullets for possible comprehension. Let's try this again before you suffer a stroke.
When I said "quoted above," I referenced your prior post and the article you quoted therein. That was quote of that TE's impression of Incognito
as a rookie. Read your post prior to the quoted post, in which you quote a portion of the article itself. That language, quoted from the article by you, was not a reference to the complaint by the woman, which I stated was "last year". Incognito is not himself a rookie, so react a little less and read/think a little more.
I won't explain the law, because your head appears to be hurting from the gasket you blew in reacting to my post. The investigation into the woman's complaint was last year and nothing happened. Why? Because the woman was victimized in front of a crowd and the police illegally squashed it out of love for Incognito? Or perhaps because the police found no probable cause to pursue criminal charges after a full investigation, as legally would have to be the case when presented with a complaint of sexual assault?
The hypothetical (using the conditional word 'if', as you appear to believe I offered some additional 'fact' of consensual sex not in the article) was of how that can happen, and frequently does in life, without a real problem criminally or civilly. If you wish to swallow parts of stories and partial facts (this 'volunteer' was hanging out with a drunken Incognito - was she working? Was she staying after hours and partying? What happened during the entirety of this encounter that day? How much if this large story is summarized in the few sentences offered and apparently accepted as gospel by you.} Try critical thinking (ie., questioning the stories given to you in short form) - it can be highly enlightening and makes you less susceptible to shock media stories based on less than complete accounts.
The reason consensual acts are not criminal or even actionable in tort is because both parties willingly participate. If that woman agreed to let Incognito stuff a live dolphin up her private regions, then it only becomes a matter of animal cruelty if he does so. It is not sexual assault or rape. You may find that act offensive to your sensibilities, but your sensitivity does not define the law. Shocking but true. Welcome to the wonderful world of consensual acts. There is no per se rule prohibiting contact between golf clubs and nether regions. Now take your thorazine and calm yourself.
***And before this becomes a declaration condoning violence against women, I formally disclaim any reading of my post that may be construed as encouraging acts of violence against women. The foregoing is only intended as describing lawful acts by consenting adults consistent with the law. No dolphins were harmed in the creation of this post.****
