- Joined
- Sep 11, 2007
- Messages
- 4,177
- Reaction score
- 1,854
Neat. Who plays split end?I see Parker as our 4th
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.
Neat. Who plays split end?I see Parker as our 4th
"Have to" is also speculation. I think it's fair to say that last year was a regression in the rebuild process. There's a lot of ground to be made up for this upcoming season. That sets the whole rebuild back...that's why it's going to take 2-3 years. This year is going to be all about "where's Mac at and is he 'The Guy'". If he is, then next year is the "have to" be in contention year (and even then, I think it's too early for that talk).I don’t think “ hoping” is a good approach to this season. This is year #4 of their rebuild, and they have to make the jump to contender now, not 2 years from now. They have build a good solid team overall, but now they have to make a move to become a good playoff caliber team. I’m not saying they have to be as good as the Chiefs, Bengals, Eagles, but they need to be able to really compete with them, and not get blown off the field in the first half. That’s a reasonable expectation for their 4th season after Brady, but they would still need to make the jump to serious Lombardi contender for the 2024 season and beyond. And regardless of all of their moves Mac Jones is going to have to make a really big jump in his play this season, or none of their moves on offense will matter.
"Have to" is also speculation. I think it's fair to say that last year was a regression in the rebuild process. There's a lot of ground to be made up for this upcoming season. That sets the whole rebuild back...that's why it's going to take 2-3 years. This year is going to be all about "where's Mac at and is he 'The Guy'". If he is, then next year is the "have to" be in contention year (and even then, I think it's too early for that talk).
I don’t think they will add Hopkins and a first round pick at receiver I would expect it’s one or the other. Thornton was higher on the depth chart than Bourne for a lot of the season so I see Thornton as closer to 4 than 6. Combine that with how injury prone Parker has been I’d expect Thornton to get enough snaps to develop.
"Have to" is also speculation. I think it's fair to say that last year was a regression in the rebuild process. There's a lot of ground to be made up for this upcoming season. That sets the whole rebuild back...that's why it's going to take 2-3 years. This year is going to be all about "where's Mac at and is he 'The Guy'". If he is, then next year is the "have to" be in contention year (and even then, I think it's too early for that talk).
ThorntonNeat. Who plays split end?
So just to clarify you want Tyquan Thornton on the line of scrimmage vs press?Thornton
How bad is it that the team with the worst WR group in the league doesn't even want him?N'Keal Harry is a Free Agent
Lighten up.How bad is it that the team with the worst WR group in the league doesn't even want him?
Lighten up.
N'Keal was the master of the First Down. The real problem was he kept getting back up.
A DRAFT PICK? Yikes. I am totally not fine with that. BB has a terrible track record picking WRs; this seems to be the one area of football that he simply cannot learn from his mistakes. His whiffs are legendary. We all know what a disaster N'Keal Harry was (he was such a flop that it drove Brady out of town). The jury is still out on Tyquon Thornton; the Patriots took him instead of George Pickens; was that the right move? I don't know.Im fine with them adding a draft pick. Flowers, Mims, or even a later round prospect.
I’m beginning to think you’re right, and I’m not thrilled about it.I’ve come to the conclusion that Bill is all set with the receiving corps. Anything major going forward would be a surprise to me. I definitely could see us drafting some WR’s or a TE in the draft for future contracts and what-not. I wouldn’t be surprised if Bill sees JJSS as the WR 1, and Gesicki as your primary slot. You’d have JJSS, KB, HH, and Gesicki on the field together quite a bit. Then you’d mix in DP and TT. That’s not toooo bad.
Among other things, yesSo just to clarify you want Tyquan Thornton on the line of scrimmage vs press?
They have some solid receiving options already. I don’t want them to never pick a receiver again because they’re in a drought on the few ones that they’ve actually taken. This isn’t Homer Simpson and “You tried and failed. The lesson is never try.”A DRAFT PICK? Yikes. I am totally not fine with that. BB has a terrible track record picking WRs; this seems to be the one area of football that he simply cannot learn from his mistakes. His whiffs are legendary. We all know what a disaster N'Keal Harry was (he was such a flop that it drove Brady out of town). The jury is still out on Tyquon Thornton; the Patriots took him instead of George Pickens; was that the right move? I don't know.
A DRAFT PICK? Yikes. I am totally not fine with that. BB has a terrible track record picking WRs; this seems to be the one area of football that he simply cannot learn from his mistakes. His whiffs are legendary. We all know what a disaster N'Keal Harry was (he was such a flop that it drove Brady out of town). The jury is still out on Tyquon Thornton; the Patriots took him instead of George Pickens; was that the right move? I don't know.