Wozzy
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2018
- Messages
- 14,092
- Reaction score
- 20,242
How about his peers, players playing right now where all things are equal? No, Crawdaddy doesn’t want to do that because it will highlight just how ordinary his passing stats are.Thru 2006 yes, after not so much, that is in large part why BB went after Moss and Welker
The other point for all: using career QB Rating is also wrong when using guys that played into their decline. Take the years Jackson has played and look at the guys active who have QB Ratings in the same or better range in the same amount of years.
The current love affair with running QB's is as usual an over reaction. Bobby Douglas, Vick, and even Grogan isn't the way. The way is a Steve Young type that is accurate, killer arm, very dangerous running but, tuck it an go 2-4 times a game when nobody is open and there is a way forward to get yardage and a place to slide. Jackson will be long gone at year 20, 15, and my bet: 10 or less as a major force. If BB drafted him great, but he didn't best case is maybe get the value back it takes to get him/pay for him. I rate that as < 10%.
If you compare his playoff stats to anyone, it will highlight just how poorly he plays against good playoff defenses. He’s been dreadful.
Odd how often Crawdaddy preaches how important QB’s are and they’re the reason for the rings, but how he ignore how abysmal Lamar has been in the postseason. Laughable…
Last edited:











