- Joined
- Sep 9, 2008
- Messages
- 32,653
- Reaction score
- 23,194
Moving goalposts much? You said that nobody who leaves the Patriots does very well- does it take 3 or 4 pro bowls to be considered 'doing well' now? If that's how ridiculous you have to make your arguments to hold up your flimsy point, then you've already lost it.
In Bledsoe's first year in Buffalo, he threw for 4300 yards, 24 TDs, 15 INTs, and an 86 QB rating. Anyone without an axe to grind would consider that 'doing well'. And that was his career high in yards and 1.7 points off of his career high in QB rating, so saying that he was nowhere near his prime is just stupid.
Belichick decided to switch to Brady because Brady was a better QB, regardless of what year it was. It had absolutely nothing to do with Bledsoe being past his prime, and was all about Bledsoe not having the skill-set that Belichick desired. If you're going to have an attitude, you should probably have a clue what you're talking about first.
You just admitted that Law had at least one 'real good year', so that's another guy who did pretty well.
Vinatieri hit multiple clutch FGs in the regular season and the playoffs to help the Colts win the SB the year that he left. That's exactly what they brought him over to do.
As far as 'worshipping at Hobbs' feet', get a clue. I've pretty firmly established how I feel about Hobbs: A pretty good CB who was overmatched against a lot of #1 receivers. If he's your #1 CB, your secondary is in trouble. It's hardly his fault, though, that he was asked to play a role that he wasn't ideally suited for. He did everything that he could to help the team, including playing through injuries that other guys would never have played with. And I fully expect that Philly fans will boo the hell out of Hobbs- they booed Santa Claus, FFS.
What makes you think Wilfork will stay healthy whereas Seymour won't? Over the last couple of years, Seymour has had exactly one significant injury (his knee, which he sustained while playing fullback), and last year demonstrated that he's back to 100%. Seymour's 29, btw- on what planet is that considered old?
Heh, you didn't make a single coherent point throughout your two posts, which is pretty much what I expected after your stellar start.
Excellent analysis of Hobbs, IMO. As I stated in the other thread, I am going to agree w/ you, Nash, and Deus here. He was a solid 2 or 3 at worst, and should not be treated at though he was D.Starks. It's a damn shame that he'll be remembered here for last yr's poor secondary and pass rush.












