TheBostonStraggler
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- May 21, 2006
- Messages
- 6,320
- Reaction score
- 5,694
Yep, and give Arrington credit too.
Put me in among the chorus of people who saw Welker's fourth quarter and OT performance as something familiar. I loved him while he was here, but his limitations were evident toward the end. He's as tough as they come, but mentally, he loses that edge in the clutch.
As for the OT play, Welker should have caught that. It wouldn't have been a first down, but I think most receivers make that catch and hang on.
Oh well...Welker takes the long flight home with Forehead, while Edelman drives 10 minutes home, props his feet up, and sleeps well.
Damn fine point. In the rush to judge WW's performance, few have made the additional point to credit Arrington. While WW has his failings like every player, there isn't a DC out there who doesn't think WW is a very difficult prospect to plan against. Yet our #3 CB did a great job of shutting down an otherwise pass catching machine. Even on the completions to WW, there was competitive coverage. With Arrington largely taking care of his assignment and Talib largely taking care of his assignment? That makes the passing field of play so much more manageable for everyone else on the defense.
It just goes to show this secondary can be solid when all the pieces are in place (Talib, Dennard, Arrington) allowing everyone to be put in their 'sweet' spot. And if these pieces we had against Denver were available last week for the Panthers? Well, let's just say I like the odds that the outcome would have been markedly different.












