Coleman is now getting as many snaps as Lucas and is listed as the starting LT with Lucas behind him on the depth chart. So let's not pretend Lucas was a great signing. He's getting beat out by a 3rd-round rookie.
I haven't been defending Van Pelt, and won't be. Daniels is 2 years older and much more experienced than Maye, so I'm okay with them waiting on Maye. The thing about Daniels was never "is he ready," but only, "how long will he last?" If both were available at #3, not sure which I'd have taken, but if it was Daniels, I'd be pretty happy right now.
The problem with the Pats o-line was at Tackle, not the interior. We had Onwenu and Sow (and Strange) and Mafi (who didn't progress), and drafted a guard. And we had a backup center in place in Jake Andrews (who also plays guard). FA preceded the draft, mostly, and the injuries were mostly post both.
And yes, I would have liked Biadasz anyway, and Tyron Smith.
This is why I give them one more off-season. They're rolling over a lot of money, will have another high pick, and will get back some key players. This year is to see what they have and don't have. If they're not aggressive in FA and draft badly in 25, I promise to be right there with you.
Polk looks like a hit to me, despite his lack of chances. In a decent system with good QB'ing, he'd be lighting it up.
Lucas has started every game, Lucas has played 162 snaps and Coleman 100. Lucas has played more snaps in every game.
The Washington offense has been a hell of a lot better with him than we have been with our LT. News flash: passably competant is a major upgrade.
Both teams drafted a LT in the 3rd, one decided to find someone else who could play there.
The interior OL gags been just as bad as the Ts.
My concern is why would you think he will spend next year if he didn’t this year? And our spending when truly analyzed (cash AND cap, willingness to pay upfront cash on top players rather than higher one time salaries on lesser or older players) our spending over the last 30 years, we do not spent as much as most teams. Belichick devised a cap strategy to hide that disadvantage as best he could but those days are over.
I despise the idea that a team takes a year to “see what they have”. Building an NFL roster is about evaluating players properly, not putting them in the field to see what you have. Why would we not sign better players to make a better roster and give the good players a chance to perform? Do we really need to lose with Friends U, Verdarian Lowe, Raekwon McMillan, Marcus Wilson, Jacoby brissett, Jaylin Hawkins,Daniel Ekuale etc, etc in order to see what they are? Signing players better than those would have zero negative. We just chose not to.
If Poll was capable of lighting it up shouldn’t he be a reason we don’t suck? Even if we have pressure 50% of the time, he could make plays the other 50%?
In 4 games he has 8 catches. One for 21 yards and the others were 7,7,6,5,9,0
I mean I understand there are excuses but in 4 games he has 1 catch of more than 10 yard, us averaging less than 8 a catch and his 4 game numbers project to 34 catches for 259 yards.
I mean NKeal Harry averaged more receiving yards per game in his patriot career than that. So it’s hard for me to see superstar out there right now.