- Joined
- Apr 3, 2006
- Messages
- 26,109
- Reaction score
- 52,116
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Fair enough. If Goodell pointed out that Jones tried to circumvent the suspension process, and also sue his colleagues, you don't think that holds any weight?
I really don't have much experience with this kind of thing.
Is Jones bound to the league by the CBA? Owners as individuals seem like a 3rd party to that agreement. I wonder if there is a separate agreement in place that gives the Commissioner authority to do stuff to the other owners.
Awesome, thanks!Bound by the Constitution and Bylaws.
http://static.nfl.com/static/content/public/static/html/careers/pdf/co_.pdf
If you dig through it, you'll see Goodell pretty much has Article 46 like powers over other owners. Of course, at the same time I would point at Article 8.1 as a basic response (although legally, I'd expect this would be applicable in a lawsuit against the other owners rather than Goodell himself).
The violation of any of the provisions of this Article IX shall constitute conduct detrimental to the League and professional football.
No member, nor any stockholder... shall:
(4) Publicly criticize any member club or its management, personnel, employees, or coaches and/or any football official employed by the League. All complaints or criticism in respect to the foregoing shall be made to the Commissioner only ans shall not be publicized directly or indirectly;
Clarity on NFL and #Cowboys owner Jerry Jones: It’s not a fine, it’s a reimbursement of costs incurred by member clubs. More than $2M. The resolution has been on the books for more than 20 years. Goodell did this after consulting with owners.
Article 46 is in the CBA, i.e. the league's agreement with the union. It doesn't apply here.I am not a lawyer, but since Goodell won the Brady Appeal Case, federal judges agree with Goodell that Article 46 gives him the right to literally do anything he wants, including to lie, cheat or steal.
Imagine being the judge ruling on whether Goodell can call someone's reticence about giving him $40m a year "conduct detrimental". The obvious baseline is to rule against Goodell immediately, and laugh while doing it, and you work backwards from there based upon further information.
The baseline is that Goodell can suspend someone for something that didn't happen.
I'm pretty sure "reticence about giving him $40m" is sadly a step up.
Should he get a medal for egging him on in punishing Brady?Goodell can stand on a podium, tell bald face lies to the media regarding tb12 and deflategate and get off scottfree... and he thinks he can judge someone else? Jones should get a freakin medal for trying to oust commissioner ginger
The baseline is article 46 gives him the right do whatever he wants short of murder and rape.
That is what judges parker and chin signed off on.