- Joined
- Mar 12, 2012
- Messages
- 13,532
- Reaction score
- 23,969
Hard to argue any of this:
Deshaun Watson didn’t just need an NFL owner who was desperate when he was shopping his services in the spring. He needed someone who would also see the women he’d sexually violated as disposable, not worthy of real care and concern.
In Dee and Jimmy Haslam, he found both.
The Haslams might not have assaulted or harassed anyone, as Deshaun Watson was accused of doing in civil suits filed by two dozen women. But the owners of the Cleveland Browns did significant harm to women all the same, be it with their enthusiastic embrace of a sexual predator – yeah, I said it – or their enabling of him Thursday.
The Haslams can try and spin this – and Lord knows they’ve tried – but the truth is they value Watson’s arms and legs over the bodies and souls of women. These women in particular, though the message to all women is clear:
Your pain and suffering is inconsequential. Your thoughts and opinions are irrelevant. You are insignificant.
Jimmy and Dee Haslam, Browns owners, hurt women with their support of Deshaun Watson | Opinion
Browns owners Dee and Jimmy Haslam valued Deshaun Watson’s arms and legs over the bodies and souls of women, and they must own that.
www.usatoday.com











