- Joined
- Nov 14, 2006
- Messages
- 49,639
- Reaction score
- 28,362
I didn't see those comments, only the comments saying Peyton Manning would have scored more points in the Superbowl against the Rams in 01 than Brady did. My point was NE never gets to the Superbowl with 2001 version of Peyton.
Brady was the perfect QB for the 2001 season.
The 2003 season could have been won with a lot of other QBs, as the defense was that good that year. The 01 def while good, was nothing historically good, like the 03 and 04 defenses were.
I think you may be sleeping on the 2001 defense though. They didn't start out all that great. They were decent. But the second half of the season, they gave up the fewest points in the league. And they were one of the only defense to play the Rams tough not once but twice. Sure they gave 24 points to the Rams in that regular season game, but Terrell Buckley had a pick six in that game and they beat up the Rams' offense.
And I think Brady was more important in 2004 than 2001 and 2003. The Pats lost both Ty Law and Tyrone Poole that season and they were put together with scotch tape at CB down the stretch with Troy Brown playing the nickel CB position. The defense took a bit of a step back from 2003 in 2004.