somebody tell me how you can spend cash in excess of the cap on players, consistently, with no repercussions.
Don’t just say “cash and cap are different.” Duh, you can spend now on future obligations vis bonuses and “look great” if your goal is to look spendy.
NE last year went the second furthest of any team and had the most remaining cap room. That’s a good thing. I’m old enough to remember everybody complaining about the free agent spending spree that got us Hunter Henry and, unfortunately, jonnu Smith. But I digress.
I am interested in a database tracking the mysterious cash metric that’s “different from the cap” over a decade long period. Or do you mean were last in spending over the cap?
It looks to me like we’re mad at good cap management, and your local sports media is all reporting each others reporting. And of course, “wahhhh the Pats don’t spend enough” is a fan favorite.
Just give me the “actual cash” source - where’s the database and who is the source? Tracking the cap itself is a sort of cottage industry by now, but what is this “actual cash spent,” where is it tracked, and why do its keepers maintain that “cap isn’t cash,” I.e. that, over 10 years, if you spend to the cap exactly, you’re underspending on personnel. Are we talking about payments outside of contracts? Because the cap applies to contracts, and such payments are illegal under the cap.
Again, there are plenty of tactics that can show up as low spend in one year bc money is freed up. But it seems that over 10 years the temporary distortions would be absorbed. By what magic are the Pats spending according to the cap but never having to actually pay the $? Or are you talking about spending over the cap? Or is this just everybody saying “Reiss reports that The Athletic reports” etc., with no public database behind it?