- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 72,685
- Reaction score
- 22,512
Looks like Vrabel agrees with me
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Chiefs were significantly better on offense when Bienemy was their OC than without him. His years were also largely the best of Andy Reid’s career.no reflection on the O/P posting, but I simply do not believe it.
Bienemy flamed out big in Washington in less than 1 year, and over stayed his welcome at UCLA in less than 1 year.
question being if Nagy is/was going to get a HC job (maybe N.O.?) would Bienemy be welcome back in KC? I believe not
Andy Reid’s best years were with Bienemy as his OC, by a significant difference tbhF-that.
Andy Reid is the OC in KC.
And with Tyreek Hill, and still in his prime, Travis Kelce.Andy Reid’s best years were with Bienemy as his OC, by a significant difference tbh
Yep and happens to coincide with Mahomes.Andy Reid’s best years were with Bienemy as his OC, by a significant difference tbh
I won't dispute the numbersChiefs were significantly better on offense when Bienemy was their OC than without him. His years were also largely the best of Andy Reid’s career.
Was Bienemy even calling the plays? I think the difference is the weapons.Andy Reid’s best years were with Bienemy as his OC, by a significant difference tbh
Not really because the offense has not been as good since Bienemy left.Yep and happens to coincide with Mahomes.
They got better when he became OC and got worse when he left.Was Bienemy even calling the plays? I think the difference is the weapons.
Kelce is in decline.Not really because the offense has not been as good since Bienemy left.
So you are saying that OCs are irrelevant, it’s all about the TE?Kelce is in decline.
Players play. Coaches are great as long has they have great players. I heard that somewhere recently.Kelce is in decline.
No thats what you are saying I said.So you are saying that OCs are irrelevant, it’s all about the TE?
Isn’t that a logical assumption?No thats what you are saying I said.
Correct.Isn’t that a logical assumption?
We disagree about Bienemys impact.
I say the offense has been much worse since he left.
You rebut that with
Kelce has declined
So then you are saying OCs are irrelevant and it’s all about the TE because your only reason the OC doesn’t deserve credit or blame is the TECorrect.
No I said losing a top WR and their TE no longer being an all-pro caliber player is why the offense is not what it was.So then you are saying OCs are irrelevant and it’s all about the TE because your only reason the OC doesn’t deserve credit or blame is the TE
Edit: let me clarify. I know you did “say” that, but that is what you said amounts to
| 6 | 817 |
| 11 | 1K |
| 17 | 2K |
| 0 | 246 |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 30 - May 15 (Through 26yrs)











