- Joined
- Nov 14, 2006
- Messages
- 52,976
- Reaction score
- 34,013
Straw man argument aside, I wonder if you’re aware that you’re destroying your own argument here?
It wasn’t the routes? But that’s not what you said in the original claim that I responded to…
Safe throws are slants, out routes, hitches. Checkdown routes. So you either misspoke or you moved the goalposts. Your pick. In any event, we agree that he had the same route options Mac did.
Prove all of this, please. What percentage of plays was he under center during that stretch vs a similar four game stretch for Mac? What percentage did the team run PA vs a similar four game stretch for Mac? What percentage did the team call a run on first down for Zappe vs any four game stretch for Mac? Cite your sources.
Like I said, I prefer Mac over Zappe. There are many different ways you can make that case. You just chose the wrong one and, instead of just saying that maybe you were a little overzealous and pivoting to making that case in those different ways, you’ve chosen to dig your heels in.
Which is a safer throw to make? A throw on third and two or third and ten? A throw when you have a strong running game and defenses have to worry about the run or where the offense has abandoned the run and every on the defensive side knows it is going to be a pass? A safer throw doesn't just mean screens. Safer throws are also when a QB is in a position where he doesn't have gain a first down on third and long because they offense set up a second and short rather than trying to get a ten plus yard play on first down. A safer throw is when you make opposing teams have to worry about the run and not just pin their ears back to rush the passer or drop seven or eight into coverage.
And my argument isn't being destroyed at all.
And Bedard, Lazar, and most of the guys who broke down plays and studied the game film all have said the same thing I am saying now. You want numbers go to their sites. Maybe they have it.












