Steve102
You are an ill-made, spiteful little creature.
PatsFans.com Supporter
2023 Weekly Picks Winner
2024 NFL 16-0 Picks Week
2024 Casino Champ
- Joined
- May 16, 2008
- Messages
- 13,602
- Reaction score
- 25,798
Hey, we all have opinions. That's what makes the world so fun.
Welker before....
...Julius Adams. It's a pink hat, the world began in 2001 type of opinion. I get it.
...Vrabel, White, Hightower, Vinatieri. True enough, Welker may have been better at his position than these 4 were at their positions. Very debatable with Vinatieri though. This is an opinion that values 6 years of WR stats that amounted to regular season success over 4 players who had game changing, NFL Films moments leading to multiple SB wins. I get it. Aw ****, I'm lying. I don't get it.
As for Parcells. He was important to the franchise turning around. Not even arguable. He was vital, not important. If only it ended there. I liken Parcells to Benedict Arnold. Before dismissing this as a lazy way to call someone a traitor.... Benedict Arnold was a heroic Revolutionary figure before betraying the original Patriots. His part in planning and executing the siege of Fort Ticondaroga was vital to beating the British. Then he felt slighted when he was passed up for promotion (probably rightfully so). And he joined the British and betrayed us. Parcells felt slighted (perhaps rightfully so), and he virtually threw a winnable SB.
Parcells belongs in the Patriots HOF as much as Arnold belongs in a Revolutionary Patriots HOF.
Two killer posts on the subject.Yes, Julius can wait more time...because he is dead. We'll toss him out to focus on the 2001 to 2019 for obvious reasons. 6 rings warrants recency bias. No argument here.
As a Patriots fan, those 6 rings are what brought me the greatest joy. The players who contributed in a major way to multiple championships are more HOF-worthy TO ME. I appreciate numbers just fine. I just don't masturbate to them.
As you agreed, the following should be before Welker: White, Edelman, Brady, Vinatieri. Why White? Welker was a much better WR than White was a RB. Not even close. So why does White deserve it more than Welker? 28-3.
Vrabel impacted those first 3 SB's as much as any player except the QB. His impact to the dynasty isn't even comparable to Welker's. Don't be stupid. Sure, Vrabel comes across as a douchey, hardo of a coach. If that makes you forget his impact here, that's on you. He is not that different than James White.
While I share your lack of love for McCourty, he certainly had major impacts on winning rings. He belongs in the Pats HOF before Welker. However, Welker should be in the conversation for NFL HOF. That's a place McCourty will never be without a ticket.
Gronk? Not even a debate. Let's add him to the list above.
Hightower? For the tackle in the Seattle game before Malcolm Go, and the strip sack in the 28-3 game, he belongs as soon as eligible.
Slater? Yes, I know ST do not matter. But surely a ST captain and perennial pro bowler on SB winning teams is more important to Pats history than the best (or 2nd best) WR during a ring-less spell.
Those 9 listed above belong in there before Welker should get a mention. Julius Adams should be obvious to anyone with a clue. That's 10.
I will concede that Antowain Smith, Malcolm Butler, Mosi Tatupu, and others who are more identifiable in Patriot history are more controversial. I would put them in before Welker too. I understand why most would disagree with them.
Welker, Pat HOF class of 2034 sounds about right to me.












