- Joined
- Mar 12, 2012
- Messages
- 13,814
- Reaction score
- 24,336
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Boston.com | Posted: 06/15 New! |
| Tom Brady writes heartfelt post celebrating son Jack’s graduation: ‘One of the proudest days of my life’ |
Boston.com | Posted: 06/15 👁: 33 |
| Report: After knee procedure, Patriots rookie LB is NFL’s only unsigned second-rounder |
98.5 The Sports Hub | Posted: 06/15 👁: 34 |
| 4 Big takeaways from Patriots OTAs and minicamp |
MassLive | Posted: 06/15 👁: 52 |
| Behind the powerful message Patriots coaches gave Christian Barmore |
MassLive | Posted: 06/15 👁: 28 |
| How Tom Brady helped transform Harry Kane from doubting teenager into England’s greatest scorer |
| "Fresh Ideas" for 2026? 1 Reactions | 06/15 at 10:49 pm |
| TODAY'S TOP POSTERS: | # | |
| No Posters To Display yet. | ||
Yet our early poll results are suggesting we stay at 15 and pick a non-QB, which IMO is very interesting.Seems like trade up and get the qb is going to be the obvious narrative.
I agree. The issue with the mediots IMO is most of them don't take into account the decision process is very different in different places yet they apply the same decision criteria to all. Consider the difference between places such a NE, SF, BAL vs CHI, WAS, CIN. Sure a great player is a great player, but each of those teams have different processes and different needs and no one can predict how things will turn out with any degree of accuracy.tbh at this point we have no idea listening and reading these mediots that think they are in the know. No self respecting franchise would ever let their pick be known by the riff raff.
Personally I’d be fine with Fields or Lance. I’d also be ok with a lot of positional players in this draft if that’s they way they go.
Yep, this simple poll shows how difficult it is to make this kind of decision.No idea
Yet our early poll results are suggesting we stay at 15 and pick a non-QB, which IMO is very interesting.
I agree. The issue with the mediots IMO is most of them don't take into account the decision process is very different in different places yet they apply the same decision criteria to all. Consider the difference between places such a NE, SF, BAL vs CHI, WAS, CIN. Sure a great player is a great player, but each of those teams have different processes and different needs and no one can predict how things will turn out with any degree of accuracy.
Yep, this simple poll shows how difficult it is to make this kind of decision.
What's your coupon code at MeUndies?Any further input on my end would require a paid subscription
Are we over-thinking this?
That's what I would do if it were up to me. Keep taking QBs you like till you get one that displays franchise QB performance in your system. However I don't think BB thinks the same way. He'll keep thinking about the 'best use' of that draft slot, and seems to convince himself he can get by with Cam or some other meh QB and picking someone else makes his team better over all.Trade up for QB, if we have someone we really like. It’s the final piece to the puzzle to start competing again. Take a chance.
| 28 | 1K |
| 14 | 479 |
| 83 | 3K |
| 84 | 3K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
June 1 - June 16 (Through 26yrs)











