- Joined
- Mar 12, 2012
- Messages
- 13,825
- Reaction score
- 24,358
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.The Athletic | Posted: 06/22 New! |
| NFL announces 2026 training camp, joint practice dates for every team |
NBC Sports Boston | Posted: 06/22 New! |
| Ranking the 25 most important Patriots for 2026: Nos. 25-21 |
The Athletic | Posted: 06/22 New! |
| What we learned from every NFL team during offseason workouts |
Boston.com | Posted: 06/21 👁: 35 |
| Watch: Julian Edelman helps Scotland fans place traffic cone atop George Washington statue in Boston |
MassLive | Posted: 06/21 👁: 149 |
| Karen Guregian: 5 up, 5 down from Patriots OTAs and minicamp |
| Miscellaneous Stuff that doesn't Belong Anywhere Else. 6 Reactions | 06/22 at 4:17 pm |
| Welcome to New England - Illinois Edge Gabe Jacas! (2nd round, #55) 4 Reactions | 06/22 at 5:31 am |
Steve Balestrieri
| TODAY'S TOP POSTERS: | # | |
| mayoclinic | 8 posts | |
| rkarp1 | 7 posts | |
| captain stone | 6 posts | |
| Family | 6 posts | |
| TheRainMaker | 5 posts |
Yet our early poll results are suggesting we stay at 15 and pick a non-QB, which IMO is very interesting.Seems like trade up and get the qb is going to be the obvious narrative.
I agree. The issue with the mediots IMO is most of them don't take into account the decision process is very different in different places yet they apply the same decision criteria to all. Consider the difference between places such a NE, SF, BAL vs CHI, WAS, CIN. Sure a great player is a great player, but each of those teams have different processes and different needs and no one can predict how things will turn out with any degree of accuracy.tbh at this point we have no idea listening and reading these mediots that think they are in the know. No self respecting franchise would ever let their pick be known by the riff raff.
Personally I’d be fine with Fields or Lance. I’d also be ok with a lot of positional players in this draft if that’s they way they go.
Yep, this simple poll shows how difficult it is to make this kind of decision.No idea
Yet our early poll results are suggesting we stay at 15 and pick a non-QB, which IMO is very interesting.
I agree. The issue with the mediots IMO is most of them don't take into account the decision process is very different in different places yet they apply the same decision criteria to all. Consider the difference between places such a NE, SF, BAL vs CHI, WAS, CIN. Sure a great player is a great player, but each of those teams have different processes and different needs and no one can predict how things will turn out with any degree of accuracy.
Yep, this simple poll shows how difficult it is to make this kind of decision.
What's your coupon code at MeUndies?Any further input on my end would require a paid subscription
Are we over-thinking this?
That's what I would do if it were up to me. Keep taking QBs you like till you get one that displays franchise QB performance in your system. However I don't think BB thinks the same way. He'll keep thinking about the 'best use' of that draft slot, and seems to convince himself he can get by with Cam or some other meh QB and picking someone else makes his team better over all.Trade up for QB, if we have someone we really like. It’s the final piece to the puzzle to start competing again. Take a chance.
| 28 | 1K |
| 14 | 502 |
| 83 | 3K |
| 84 | 4K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
June 7 - June 22 (Through 26yrs)











