ashley
Banned
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2014
- Messages
- 19,926
- Reaction score
- 33,922
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I like what I'm seeing
Fortunately NE doesn’t have that issue.........Their QB play wasn't helping.
Maybe I’m mistaken, but I think the team is envisioning him being the next Deion Branch in his prime. That would certainly fit this offense if he can catch the ball. So far unfortunately he also seems to have Branch’s brittleness.That was some very impressive route running, along with the speed and athleticism to make him pay after the setup. Love it.
Corey Davis got identical money (over an additional, third year), but I would argue has a more limited ceiling. Davis is a really good, predictable ‘X’, but he doesn’t have the athleticism or top-end speed to threaten a defense deep.
Agholar, on the other hand, has a higher ceiling, is more athletic, better speed, and can be a true deep threat. He’s also viable over the middle and from the slot as well. A lot more potential there for sure, and most likely a better fit for what the Pats need (so long as he can consistently and reliably catch the ball).
What about now?Depending on the money I don’t hate it.
$13 mill a year I don’t love it. Especially considering Corey Davis got the same thing and I think he’s a much better receiver.What about now?
My fear that Billy would Overpay for Mediocrity has come true, naturally.
Curtis Samuel & Corey Davis >>>>>>>>>>>>> Agholor & Kenny Bourne.
I’d rather have Agholor than Davis. Also, you can’t say Samuel and Davis >>>>> when Samuel hasn’t even signed with anyone yet and you don’t know how much money he’s going to get.What about now?
My fear that Billy would Overpay for Mediocrity has come true, naturally.
Curtis Samuel & Corey Davis >>>>>>>>>>>>> Agholor & Kenny Bourne.
What about now?
My fear that Billy would Overpay for Mediocrity has come true, naturally.
Curtis Samuel & Corey Davis >>>>>>>>>>>>> Agholor & Kenny Bourne.
$13 mill a year I don’t love it. Especially considering Corey Davis got the same thing and I think he’s a much better receiver.
Branch had the same per-game stats in SEA as he did here.0-6 isn't great regardless - Deion Branch was a solid player but Brady had a lot to do with that
Agholor is a fierce down-the-field blocker and has played multiple positions at WR.Davis (to this point in his career) is certainly a more consistent receiver than Agholor, but I'm not sure he's necessarily a "better" receiver. I would argue Agholor has a higher ceiling and provides speed / threatens the deep part of the field in ways Davis doesn't.
Davis is a very good, rock-solid 'X', with great hands and physicality. But he isn't a true deep threat. I wouldn't have been disappointed with Davis at all, and I think he's a very good receiver. But the Pats hopefully will benefit more from Agholor's skill-set than Davis' right now.
Agholor is a fierce down-the-field blocker and has played multiple positions at WR.
For good or bad, that matters tremendously to BB and Josh.
Yea if you google Agholor blocking there are quotes from Reich and Petersen praising him for it. Plus my Iggles buddy said he was really good at it. The prick pointed out some block he made on Chung in the SB that sprung LG for a big gain.I wasn't aware of this. Very good information and certainly informs the decision a bit more. Love to hear it.
I don’t love Agholor but I’m happy they upgraded the position. I think they may have overpaid a little bit but I’d guess his ability to play in the slot and outside is what sold them over Davis who’s strictly an outside guy.Davis (to this point in his career) is certainly a more consistent receiver than Agholor, but I'm not sure he's necessarily a "better" receiver. I would argue Agholor has a higher ceiling and provides speed / threatens the deep part of the field in ways Davis doesn't.
Davis is a very good, rock-solid 'X', with great hands and physicality. But he isn't a true deep threat. I wouldn't have been disappointed with Davis at all, and I think he's a very good receiver. But the Pats hopefully will benefit more from Agholor's skill-set than Davis' right now.
Has to be, and I hope they put something in there for drops as well. Tape is ugly. Please mute the video.Exactly. Just gotta see the structure of these deals and understand what's real.
I think we will learn the Agholor deal is a lot more reasonable.
Has to be, and I hope they put something in there for drops as well. Tape is ugly. Please mute the video.
That was some very impressive route running, along with the speed and athleticism to make him pay after the setup. Love it.
Corey Davis got identical money (over an additional, third year), but I would argue has a more limited ceiling. Davis is a really good, predictable ‘X’, but he doesn’t have the athleticism or top-end speed to threaten a defense deep.
Agholar, on the other hand, has a higher ceiling, is more athletic, better speed, and can be a true deep threat. He’s also viable over the middle and from the slot as well. A lot more potential there for sure, and most likely a better fit for what the Pats need (so long as he can consistently and reliably catch the ball).
I like what I'm seeing
| 47 | 2K |
| 2K | 90K |
| 50 | 5K |
| 459 | 19K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 2 - April 17 (Through 26yrs)











