- Joined
- Aug 13, 2005
- Messages
- 19,226
- Reaction score
- 12,745
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Why would he set the franchise back.Wentz carries a huge risk for not only the coach and gm who hire him, but could also set a franchise back 2 or 3 years. Maybe even more.
He shot out of a cannon into this league and looked every bit a wrecking machine. Blew out the knee and he has spiraled downhill since. That was 3 years ago btw, if he hasn’t got his mojo back by now, than I’m not sure he never will. You never know though. Again though, the kind of move that coaches and front office people lose jobs over. Too much of a risk imo.
He was once. But he hasn’t played well in a couple of years and the team went on a Super Bowl run without him. He’s since regressed, badly, in an offensive system tailored to his strengths. Combine that with the rumors about how he is in the locker room and the price tag, and I think we can get a better “hold down the fort” guy for lesser money elsewhere. Hell, I’d rather see a full season of Stidham than bring in Wentz. The only guys I’d probably take Wentz over are Cam and Haskins (who I saw you mention as another reclamation project).I want 2 options. I want a guy who could take the job and run with it. Has to be a guy with the skill set but has struggled or you couldn’t get him. More 1st round qbs fail than hit stardom so I double my odds. I’m fine with it being Jimmy but no way on smith he barely has a functioning leg. No way he could hold up in a perfect world.
Wentz once was the man, that’s the attraction.
Brady looks a lil different...I’d rather see us draft a QB with the #15 or move up and sign this guy...
View attachment 30137Get it done Bill!
He's going to be remembered and thanked for NOT playing in the superbowl because if he does they lose. You could put Mahomes in instead of Foles and we probably win. Literally everything the Eagles did worked with some help of changed review protocols and missed offensive penalties on 4th down.He was once. But he hasn’t played well in a couple of years and the team went on a Super Bowl run without him. He’s since regressed, badly, in an offensive system tailored to his strengths. Combine that with the rumors about how he is in the locker room and the price tag, and I think we can get a better “hold down the fort” guy for lesser money elsewhere. Hell, I’d rather see a full season of Stidham than bring in Wentz. The only guys I’d probably take Wentz over are Cam and Haskins (who I saw you mention as another reclamation project).
In 2019 wentz threw for 4000 yards 27 tds and 7 Ints. They were 12th in scoring won h the division.He was once. But he hasn’t played well in a couple of years and the team went on a Super Bowl run without him. He’s since regressed, badly, in an offensive system tailored to his strengths. Combine that with the rumors about how he is in the locker room and the price tag, and I think we can get a better “hold down the fort” guy for lesser money elsewhere. Hell, I’d rather see a full season of Stidham than bring in Wentz. The only guys I’d probably take Wentz over are Cam and Haskins (who I saw you mention as another reclamation project).
How’d he do in 2020?In 2019 wentz threw for 4000 yards 27 tds and 7 Ints. They were 12th in scoring won h the division.
Show me someone better than that and I’m all in. There is no one else available besides Watson who has played at that level.
I haven’t mentioned Haskins other than when he was cut sign him as qb3 on a flyer.
If I'm reading this correctly, column 2 is prorated, so already fell on Philly.Nobody will take Wentz contract, he is uncuttable, they would be glad to trade him, but he has numerous large roster bonuses and guarantees that kick in, if you trade for him and cut him the next year it’s $28 million in dead money and still a large cap hit.
Nobody is trading fo4 that contract, it’s north of 30 million every year.
He was bad that’s why he’s available. Who are you getting that was good in 2020?How’d he do in 2020?
why do you want him if he's bad, with a huge cap number?He was bad that’s why he’s available. Who are you getting that was good in 2020?
Not trueNobody will take Wentz contract, he is uncuttable, they would be glad to trade him, but he has numerous large roster bonuses and guarantees that kick in, if you trade for him and cut him the next year it’s $28 million in dead money and still a large cap hit.
Nobody is trading fo4 that contract, it’s north of 30 million every year.
He had a bad season. He has been a very good QB his cap number is fine if he goes back to his previous level of play. Coaching play calling supporting cast may have had a lot to do with it.why do you want him if he's bad, with a huge cap number?
Makes sense. The Colts coach worked on the Eagles staff when Wentz was good. I hope we don’t regret on passing on him like Miami did when Drew Brees was available.
So then why would we want him, at his cap number, with his reported issues in the locker room, while having to send draft capital to the Eagles based on production from 2019... the majority of which came against some bad pass defenses? The objective is to get better at quarterback. Not suck moderately less. If anyone trades for him, it will be the Colts or maybe the Bears. Same systems, and familiarity will play a huge part. He’s not a cerebral enough QB to thrive in the E-P and makes way too many brain dead decisions.He was bad that’s why he’s available. Who are you getting that was good in 2020?
I am not surprised the Colts are looking to trade for him. He would be perfect with Reich as he was in Philly.He had a bad season. He has been a very good QB his cap number is fine if he goes back to his previous level of play. Coaching play calling supporting cast may have had a lot to do with it.
Give me a better alternative. I will gladly pay real QB dollars for a guy who has proven he can play at a high level than get a slug for cheap.