Doctor DDS
Rotational Player and Threatening Starter's Job
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2007
- Messages
- 1,302
- Reaction score
- 2,583
Never said they could not have kept Brady money wise. The question if how do they keep him and field a Super Bowl competitive team. Agree that cutting these 2 important players and having Brady play instead would have made them slightly better in 2020 but it still leaves them well short of championship contention this year and in the near future. Isn't it possible that BB decided that due to the cap situation and a weak roster that it was in the best long term interests of the Patriots to move on now and improve the cap shape in 2021 and beyond vs the often repeated narrative of wanting to prove he can win w/o Brady?We could have afforded Brady if we wanted to. Here, I'll do it.
Let Thuney walk (he will in a year's time anyway) and I saved you $15m for this year. BOOM!!
Don't tell me Thuney is worth 4-5 wins like Brady is. And it wasn't some long-term contract, just a 1 year franchise tag. Pats just messed up that's all. Brady was good value at $25m per year for 2 years.
Or McCourty's 2yr at $23m extension. Could have skipper that if needed. I'd rather have an aging Brady for 2 years rather than an aging McCourty for 2 years. I know which options gets us more wins,
If we wanted to, we could have brought Brady back. Belichick was trying to make a statement. His legacy. He WANTED to win without Brady. To show that he deserved the credit for all those wins. And he thought Brady was fading and would fall flat on his face while BB would be able to put up decent performance without Brady (BTW he never has).
And now all this has backfired spectacularly for Belichick.
Last edited:












