Patsgofor4
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2007
- Messages
- 5,434
- Reaction score
- 10,862
Ceedee Lamb just put up 117 receiving yards in his second NFL game as a rookie after covid training camp.
Meanwhile Harry has 120 total career receiving yards and averages only 8 yards per catch
.
This is my last reply to one of your dumb post because I feel as though I am losing brain cells by interacting with you.
He only had 106 yards receiving and if you actually watched the game you would know that he was wide open on his last reception, a 24 yarder on their last drive, because he literally pushed the DB down onto the ground in the middle of his route right in front of the official with no call. When your team is throwing the ball 47 times because they were 20-0 in the first half and 29-10 at halftime and you getting WR2 snaps, you should put up some good stats, so let's not pretend that this was a typical game.
MORE TO THE POINT, highlighting Lamb's production as a way to criticize Harry is totally illogical and silly because the Pats have never been in a position to draft a borderline top 10 talent who some felt was the top receiver in one of the best wide receiver draft in years.
Why? Because the Pats are so remarkably consistent that they never mediocre enough to have the 17th pick of the draft, so when an elite talent unexpectedly falls 5-10 spots, they are never (since Wilfork at 21, at least) on the clock to benefit....so what they f*ck are you talking about? At pick 32 in 2019, there was no consensus about the best WR, because the elite, "can't miss" wideouts never last that long.
This is not about Lamb, who is a stud. This is about the ridiculous evidence you use to support your argument against Harry. It's embarrassing....for you.