Mack Herron
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2006
- Messages
- 15,102
- Reaction score
- 21,119
Have you seen the walls?I still wouldn’t rule out a return later if **** hits the fan.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Have you seen the walls?I still wouldn’t rule out a return later if **** hits the fan.
Lucien has looked thoroughly average through the last handful of preseasons, and honestly there’s some value in that. Your 4th/5th WR doesn’t need to be a world beater, he just needs to not suck. I expect McCarron or Berrios would probably make it over him, but if they choose to carry Lucien instead at this point I wouldn’t be upset about it. You could do a lot better but you could probably do worse.I'd still take Lucien, McCarron, or Berrios over Dez, or another re-tread
Bet they are a top 5 passing (and scoring) offense.
The word is CORPS, not "core." You'd think people would get this right by now. But noooooooo! Let's make a goofy post even more goofy by misperceiving a word that's key to its premise. GoofballWorst WR core in the NFL, hands down, especially the first 4 weeks
Who cares as long as it works.That's 70% Brady. His WRs wont be doing him any favor.
You think that Brady will not be top 5 in passing yard and scoring offense? Really?How far into the season are you over there on fantasy island?
Not to mention we have the best nonWR receiving group in the NFL.Who cares as long as it works.
I think Edelman and Hogan ga e been very good with Brady. I think Patterson will “do him favors” with a good catch rate and excellent runafter the catch.
Dorsett has shown some promise
What makes you think that? They don’t match well against them. And they are 0-2 now against the Cam Newton led Panthers.They would have destroyed the Panthers.
Actually both can be correct, depending on context. The corps refers to all the WRs. The core refers to the main two or three. Say, Hogan, Edelman and Patterson are the core receivers while all of them with Dorsett Lucien Berrios and MCarron are the corps....The word is CORPS, not "core." You'd think people would get this right by now. But noooooooo! Let's make a goofy post even more goofy by misperceiving a word that's key to its premise. Goofball
What do regular season games in 2013 and 2017 have to do with a SB in 2015?What makes you think that? They don’t match well against them. And they are 0-2 now against the Cam Newton led Panthers.
The Broncos D single handily won that game.
Lucien has looked thoroughly average through the last handful of preseasons, and honestly there’s some value in that. Your 4th/5th WR doesn’t need to be a world beater, he just needs to not suck. I expect McCarron or Berrios would probably make it over him, but if they choose to carry Lucien instead at this point I wouldn’t be upset about it. You could do a lot better but you could probably do worse.
It means it could be a pretty good indicator they'd lose.What do regular season games in 2013 and 2017 have to do with a SB in 2015?
Both games were toss ups and we win in 2013 if not for a terrible call.
Actually both can be correct, depending on context. The corps refers to all the WRs. The core refers to the main two or three. Say, Hogan, Edelman and Patterson are the core receivers while all of them with Dorsett Lucien Berrios and MCarron are the corps....
You just can’t make this **** up. (Our start to the season with receivers.)
Not this season.You think that Brady will not be top 5 in passing yard and scoring offense? Really?
Chris Harper is currently in the CFL; I wonder if they can finagle a way to get him out of that contract.....
Both games were toss ups and we win in 2013 if not for a terrible call.