maineman209
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2017
- Messages
- 9,642
- Reaction score
- 20,258
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.That is hilarious. Know whose website this is from?
The NFL. LOL
EDIT: Wait... are you guys sure? Pitt wins the 3-way, so they're #1. But then doesn't it revert to head-to-head for KC and NE? All the other websites show the Pats as #3. FWIW.
Have you seen them play?
I reread the tie breaker procedures and discovered where my error is. This statement above is correct; you can only take 1 team from any tiebreaking step and then it resets for everyone else.It's a good question if you rank them based on conference record or if you only take 1 and then reset.
I believe that in your scenario here, that would indeed be the case. Pittsburgh would be the #1 seed despite having lost to KC.I'm going to assume all get ranked, because of the way it is worded. It would make no sense to emphasize that H2H makes no difference unless all 3 played each other. After all, imagine if Pitt lost to KC, and KC hadn't yet played New England, and yet Pitt would have the higher %. Pitt would get the first bye still despite H2H against KC.
How do you figure that? Our schedule is not hard.I've seen them against the Jags and Bear; I've also seen them against KC. They can be good; they can be trash.
My concern is that their schedule is much, much, much softer than ours from now until 12/17.
I've seen them against the Jags and Bear; I've also seen them against KC. They can be good; they can be trash.
My concern is that their schedule is much, much, much softer than ours from now until 12/17.
How do you figure that? Our schedule is not hard.
They could easily lose to Titans, Packers, Lions, Division games. They play down to their opponents.
Chargers, Broncos should be w's. No if, and, but's about it. Brady has had Steelers number.
SD is not the hottest team in the NFL, not even close. (Neither are the LA chargers lol)Really?
Chargers are the hottest team in the NFL right now;
Bronco's in Denver is almost always a hard time;
Then we have to travel to Mexico and hope Gronk stays away from Tequila and hookers the night before the game;
the next three games after that are against division opponents and include the dreaded back to back road games.
Hardly a cake walk.
SD is not the hottest team in the NFL, not even close. (Neither are the LA chargers lol)
Denver has no offense.
The raiders are 3 consecutive penalty calls away from being 2-5.
Division games in our division this year are a cakewalk.
You mean the Cleveland Browns still have a chance for first seed?! Let's go!
The chargers are 3-4If the Chargers were able to kick field goals and didn't get so many "delay of game" penalties, they would probably be 6-1 right now.
The chargers are 3-4
They are 3-4. Coulda shoulda woulda is worthless.They lost to Denver by a FG (blocked FG);
They lost to Dolphin by 2 points (missed FG);
They lost to Eagles by 2 points (ok, no missed FG's there--ok, so they could be 5-2)
That's fair, but if that's the direction you're going to go then you have to concede that the AFC East competition is tough this year, not the "cakewalk" 6 wins you stated above.They are 3-4. Coulda shoulda woulda is worthless.
That's fair, but if that's the direction you're going to go then you have to concede that the AFC East competition is tough this year, not the "cakewalk" 6 wins you stated above.
Why? The rest of the AFCE not really any better than the Chargers.That's fair, but if that's the direction you're going to go then you have to concede that the AFC East competition is tough this year, not the "cakewalk" 6 wins you stated above.