- Joined
- Oct 10, 2006
- Messages
- 76,878
- Reaction score
- 66,861
How is that relevant to the current discussion?
Seriously?
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.How is that relevant to the current discussion?
Yes.Seriously?
Yes.
I'm sorry, I don't see it. Could you explain it to me?Read the article. The relevance is obvious.
I'm sorry, I don't see it. Could you explain it to me?
The Giants didn't go up by 2 scores with that TDThe Giants v. Patriots 2011 Super Bowl would like to speak to you....
Ok. Because the example doesn't seem relevant to me. But I could've been missing something.If you can't figure out the time aspect, here, even with an easy example fully laid out before you, I don't know how anyone could explain things to you.
Yeah, that seemed like a pretty big difference to me too.The Giants didn't go up by 2 scores with that TD
Ok. Because the example doesn't seem relevant to me. But I could've been missing something.
The Giants didn't go up by 2 scores with that TD
It's a different scenario because a TD in last night's game didn't leave the Giants as vulnerable as the Bradshaw TD did. Everyone understands the concept of running clock with a lead.Time..... Time.... Time...
I'm not sure what's so difficult to grasp here.
It's a different scenario because a TD in last night's game didn't leave the Giants as vulnerable as the Bradshaw TD did. Everyone understands the concept of running clock with a lead.
Ah, I see. So I wasn't missing anything. The scenarios aren't slightly different, they're entirely different.The scenario is slightly different. The concepts are the same. The same concepts are why kicking the FG on 4th instead of going for it should not be considered a no brainer. Time and context matter.
Ah, I see. So I wasn't missing anything. The scenarios aren't slightly different, they're entirely different.
I've seen the Pats in this same scenario a few times, usually Brady does a modified sneak where he just stays behind the center and tries not to gain or lose any yardage for a play or two and then they run the ball in for a TD on 3rd down.
This is exactly what the Giants should have done. Have Eli sneak twice get closer to the goal line. Then run the ball on third down. If you score great, if not run as much time off the clock as possible and then kick the field goal (I'm Assuming here that everyone agrees it is better to be up by 6 kicking off, than to try to score on 4th down and risk only being up by 3). As it stands, I think the Cowboys scored the game winner with 7 seconds left and the Giants gifted them 40 seconds by thowing on third down.
#PointshavinggateThis can't be true. There must be some betting going on.
Could you cite one of the examples when the patriots did this?I've seen the Pats in this same scenario a few times, usually Brady does a modified sneak where he just stays behind the center and tries not to gain or lose any yardage for a play or two and then they run the ball in for a TD on 3rd down.
This is exactly what the Giants should have done. Have Eli sneak twice get closer to the goal line. Then run the ball on third down. If you score great, if not run as much time off the clock as possible and then kick the field goal (I'm Assuming here that everyone agrees it is better to be up by 6 kicking off, than to try to score on 4th down and risk only being up by 3). As it stands, I think the Cowboys scored the game winner with 7 seconds left and the Giants gifted them 40 seconds by thowing on third down.
Yes they are.Except they're not.
| 10 | 1K |
| 19 | 1K |
| 10 | 1K |
| 4 | 4K |
| 18 | 2K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
May 27 - June 11 (Through 26yrs)











