Goodell Factor

[Ring 6]

I did. It's in the link.

I know you think that, but you are wrong.

 

[Ring 6]

Didn't see you ask that question. It has literally nothing to do with the original post about Goodell. I didn't think it was rigged, nor have I said the Patriots only lose because of the refs. But keep coming up with ridiculous strawman arguments (no wonder Andy Johnson likes your posts) that have nothing to do with what I wrote or with what the OP said.

Again, answer the question about the Jets filming? Why the double standard?

The OP explicitly said he believes the refs can and will decide games based upon what the league wants.

 

[upstater1]

I know you think that, but you are wrong.

I'm wrong? You're the one that liked a post that flat out stated there is nothing illegal about filming from the end zones. How wrong could you possibly be?

 

[SB39]

I said 100 times already. Can't you read? Goodell is biased against the New England Patriots especially when it comes to the Jets.

Now now, no need to get pissy just because I'm humiliating you. But now riddle me this: You claim Goodell is biased against the Patriots, but is he taking steps to see to it that they lose tomorrow? Is the Commissioner engaged in rigging the game? Because that's the subject of this thread.

 

[upstater1]

Now now, no need to get pissy just because I'm humiliating you. But now riddle me this: You claim Goodell is biased against the Patriots, but is he taking steps to see to it that they lose tomorrow? Is the Commissioner engaged in rigging the game? Because that's the subject of this thread.

I wrote what I wrote, and since I did you the courtesy of answering your strawman question, and you still refuse to answer my very basic question, I'm going to say that you know you're wrong, but you're one of those know-it-alls who can't admit it. That's precisely the type of person people hate to get into discussions with.

Strawman arguments left and right, and when that fails, they avoid the question entirely. I answered your question, but you won't answer mine.

 

[upstater1]

It amazes me that Patriots fans don't know the basics of Spygate.

Truly amazing.

 

[SB39]

I wrote what I wrote, and since I did you the courtesy of answering your strawman question, and you still refuse to answer my very basic question, I'm going to say that you know you're wrong, but you're one of those know-it-alls who can't admit it. That's precisely the type of person people hate to get into discussions with.

Strawman arguments left and right, and when that fails, they avoid the question entirely. I answered your question, but you won't answer mine.

Little boy, you need to relax. I'm trying to understand what you're saying here. I don't want to argue the point of whether or not Goodell is biased because I think it's futile. What I want to know is if you think, like the OP, that he is taking steps to rig the outcome of tomorrow's game.

And for some reason, you refuse to answer that. Probably because you know how silly you would look if you ever actually came out and said it,

 

[SB39]

It amazes me that Patriots fans don't know the basics of Spygate.

Truly amazing.

But not as amazing as when a Patriots fan acts like whiny little self entitled spoiled Steelers fan saying the whole league and the whole world is out to get him.

 

[upstater1]

Little boy, you need to relax. I'm trying to understand what you're saying here. I don't want to argue the point of whether or not Goodell is biased because I think it's futile. What I want to know is if you think, like the OP, that he is taking steps to rig the outcome of tomorrow's game.

And for some reason, you refuse to answer that. Probably because you know how silly you would look if you ever actually came out and said it,

You refuse to answer again.

I answered your earlier question. Answer mine.

You have nothing.

 

[upstater1]

But not as amazing as when a Patriots fan acts like whiny little self entitled spoiled Steelers fan saying the whole league and the whole world is out to get him.

It's impossible to discuss this with someone who is not only not in touch with the basic facts, but doesn't have the intelligence, honesty or capability of responding to basic questions.

 

[SB39]

It's impossible to discuss this with someone who is not only not in touch with the basic facts, but doesn't have the intelligence, honesty or capability of responding to basic questions.

I will gladly answer any question you ask which is not based on a false assumption.

Meanwhile, you refuse to answer my very simple question about whether or not you feel tomorrow's game is rigged. Because you know how foolish you look.

 

[upstater1]

I will gladly answer any question you ask which is not based on a false assumption.

Meanwhile, you refuse to answer my very simple question about whether or not you feel tomorrow's game is rigged. Because you know how foolish you look.

You will not "gladly" answer my question. You already said you would answer it if I answered a question of yours, and after I answered (this is what I wrote in #72, "I don't think it [the NFL is] rigged, nor have I said the Patriots only lose because of the refs"), you still refuse to answer. Because you aren't "glad" at all to admit you're wrong.

 

[SB39]

You will not "gladly" answer my question. You already said you would answer it if I answered a question of yours, and after I answered (this is what I wrote in #72, "I don't think it [the NFL is] rigged, nor have I said the Patriots only lose because of the refs"), you still refuse to answer. Because you aren't "glad" at all to admit you're wrong.

You're so ridiculously inconsistent and all over the place, I honestly have lost track of what you're asking. So if you ask me a question not based on a false assumption I will gladly answer it.

But since you admit you don't think the league is rigged, I really don't know what we're arguing about.

 

[Ring 6]

It's impossible to discuss this with someone who is not only not in touch with the basic facts, but doesn't have the intelligence, honesty or capability of responding to basic questions.

Is this kind of stuff really necessary?
Its a football discussion board, you really know nothing about this guys honesty, intelligence or capabilities. Or do you really think the definition of stupid is someone who disagrees with you on anything?

 

[Ring 6]

I'm wrong? You're the one that liked a post that flat out stated there is nothing illegal about filming from the end zones. How wrong could you possibly be?

Wow. Your argument now is that my knowledge,, opinions and beliefs are based upon the posts I 'like' not my actual thoughts, beliefs and comments?

Too bad the post i liked because of the Jessica Alba comment had other things in it that i apparently now believe.

You really have to step back from this paranoid persecution complex.
People disagree with you. Its not the end of the world. No one says you have to change your opinion, they just think its a poor one. Life goes on.

 

[SB39]

Wow. Your argument now is that my knowledge,, opinions and beliefs are based upon the posts I 'like' not my actual thoughts, beliefs and comments?

Too bad the post i liked because of the Jessica Alba comment had other things in it that i apparently now believe.

You really have to step back from this paranoid persecution complex.
People disagree with you. Its not the end of the world. No one says you have to change your opinion, they just think its a poor one. Life goes on.

When AndyJohnson and I agree, something is very very wrong....

 

[Ring 6]

When AndyJohnson and I agree, something is very very wrong....

Welcome to the right side

 

[upstater1]

You're so ridiculously inconsistent and all over the place, I honestly have lost track of what you're asking. So if you ask me a question not based on a false assumption I will gladly answer it.

But since you admit you don't think the league is rigged, I really don't know what we're arguing about.

I asked you back many pages in this thread about why the NFL used a double standard about the Jets taping in Foxboro. And, furthermore, why the NFL lied when it tried to address that double standard after media inquiries after punishing the Patriots.

 

[upstater1]

Is this kind of stuff really necessary?
Its a football discussion board, you really know nothing about this guys honesty, intelligence or capabilities. Or do you really think the definition of stupid is someone who disagrees with you on anything?

I was trying to be polite. I wasn't insulting him or using names like he was doing me. The funny thing is you wrote nothing about all the insults he sent my way.

 

[upstater1]

SB you are a total hypocrite. You do nothing for several pages but sling insults my way, and when Andy says I'm doing you like his post. Get a thicker skin or else if you're going to sling, don't cry when someone questions your honest.

As far as I'm concerned, both you and Andy have shown yourselves to be totally incapable of having an adult discussion here.