PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

The new NFL: Offense Rules; winning playoff teams allowed 30.5 points last week

Status
Not open for further replies.
The only team still alive from that round gave up 35 last week.

21 points in the old NFL.

14 points by KO and Punt returns was an NFL playoff record.
 
Triumph said:
Quote:

Originally Posted by AndyJohnson

The only team still alive from that round gave up 35 last week.

21 points in the old NFL.

14 points by KO and Punt returns was an NFL playoff record.

Special teams have always existed so you should have no problem giving me those examples.
14 points out of 276 not counting because you don't like special teams is as weak as an argument gets


Posted from Patsfans.com App for Android
 
Special teams have always existed so you should have no problem giving me those examples.
14 points out of 276 not counting because you don't like special teams is as weak as an argument gets


Posted from Patsfans.com App for Android
Most people understand that there are 3 phases to a football game: Offense, Defense and Special Teams. Special teams TDs are a gift that cannot be counted on every week.

You mistakenly claim that offense rules when 14 points scored by Denver were an NFL record (Special Teams rules?) and actually, the Ravens defense did a good job of stopping Manning. Conversely, the Bronco defense did a terrible job of stopping the Ravens.

7 points in the SF came when Kapernick threw a pick 6.(Defense rules?) Any team with a sizable lead will gladly trade time off the clock for points. See GB vs SF. So basically youre down to 1 game from the Divison round in this new NFL - SEA vs ATL.

What also blows your claim full of holes is that the NE defense has improved leaps and bounds from last season. NE can stop the run and the pass defense is 10 times better with Talib and Dennard at Corner.
 
actually its totally relevant. the defense that was good enough to win in the wild card round got lit up in the divisional

No, it's not totally relevant. It's irrelevant. However, as I noted, even if you wanted to pretend that it was relevant (which you apparently do), the same teams who scored 28+ in the divisional round only managed to score 24 or fewer, in winning efforts, the week before. Those teams didn't just magically get 4+ points better in the span of one week.
 
Deus Irae said:
Quote:

Originally Posted by AndyJohnson

actually its totally relevant. the defense that was good enough to win in the wild card round got lit up in the divisional

No, it's not totally relevant. It's irrelevant. However, as I noted, even if you wanted to pretend that it was relevant (which you apparently do), the same teams who scored 28+ in the divisional round only managed to score 24 or fewer, in winning efforts, the week before. Those teams didn't just magically get 4+ points better in the span of one week.
offense dominated the divisional round. That is not negated by what the teams who couldn't keep up did in the wild card round.
its really very simple


Posted from Patsfans.com App for Android
 
Triumph said:
Quote:

Originally Posted by AndyJohnson

Special teams have always existed so you should have no problem giving me those examples.
14 points out of 276 not counting because you don't like special teams is as weak as an argument gets


Posted from Patsfans.com App for Android

Most people understand that there are 3 phases to a football game: Offense, Defense and Special Teams. Special teams TDs are a gift that cannot be counted on every week.

You mistakenly claim that offense rules when 14 points scored by Denver were an NFL record (Special Teams rules?) and actually, the Ravens defense did a good job of stopping Manning. Conversely, the Bronco defense did a terrible job of stopping the Ravens.

7 points in the SF came when Kapernick threw a pick 6.(Defense rules?) Any team with a sizable lead will gladly trade time off the clock for points. See GB vs SF. So basically youre down to 1 game from the Divison round in this new NFL - SEA vs ATL.

What also blows your claim full of holes is that the NE defense has improved leaps and bounds from last season. NE can stop the run and the pass defense is 10 times better with Talib and Dennard at Corner.

Feel free to give those examples at any time.
Now you're argument is the listing teams points don't matter because the winning team scored so much? You are kissing you're own argument all by yourself



Posted from Patsfans.com App for Android
 
There's not enough data for a meaningful conclusion yet. If the remaining three games are also very high-scoring, then your argument is starting to look very strong. However, if any of the remaining three games are low-scoring, then the theory takes a big hit. Nobody should forget that this theory didn't come out of nowhere; the last few years have featured some of the highest-scoring offenses ever, so the priors for this argument were relatively strong to begin with.

Today should help tell us the truth.
 
NSPF said:
There's not enough data for a meaningful conclusion yet. If the remaining three games are also very high-scoring, then your argument is starting to look very strong. However, if any of the remaining three games are low-scoring, then the theory takes a big hit. Nobody should forget that this theory didn't come out of nowhere; the last few years have featured some of the highest-scoring offenses ever, so the priors for this argument were relatively strong to begin with.

Today should help tell us the truth.

There was never any intention to consider 1 round to be conclusive incontrovertible evidence. Just more proof of am obvious trend


Posted from Patsfans.com App for Android
 
Feel free to give those examples at any time.
Now you're argument is the listing teams points don't matter because the winning team scored so much? You are kissing you're own argument all by yourself



Posted from Patsfans.com App for Android

Good call. Offense really rules.

SF adjusted at the half and the ATL scored 0 points in the 2nd half.

NE scored 1 TD all game and 0 points in the 2nd half.

This thread ranks with your Maroney is and elite #1 RB thread.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

PatsFans.com LinkHub

𝕏 / Tweet
X.com: Watching Tom Brady Tear Through the Playoffs at Age 41
Patriots Videos
twitter.com · by Uptown
1d
𝕏 / Tweet
Post from @ghetto_gronk on X: How it's going for Tua
Funny Videos
x.com · by Ian
2d
𝕏 / Tweet
X.com: Patriots Offensive Line in Front of Behren Morton 8/13
Patriots News
twitter.com · by manxman2601
4d
𝕏 / Tweet
X.com: Efton Chism III Career Stats
Patriots Stats
twitter.com · by manxman2601
4d
𝕏 / Tweet
X.com via @Patriots: Video of the New England Patriots @newbalance Athletics Center
Patriots Videos
twitter.com · by Ian
4d
📰
📰 Article
Patriots Hall of Famer Troy Brown Joins Patriots Pregame and Postgame Shows
Uncategorized
patriots.com · by Ian
5d
𝕏 / Tweet
X.com: Patriots Tuesday 8/11
Twitter
twitter.com · by Ian
7d
MORSE: Practice 17 Notes and Updated Patriots 53-Man Roster Projection
TRANSCRIPT: Mike Vrabel Press Conference 8/17
Monday Patriots Notebook 8/17: Gonzalez Has a Big Decision to Make
Patriots News 08-16, Post PS Game #1 53-Man Roster Projection
MORSE: Notes & Analysis of Patriots Training Camp – Day 15
TRANSCRIPT: Mike Vrabel Press Conference 8/15
MORSE: Good, Bad, and Ugly From Patriots’ Underwhelming Performance vs Colts
Friday Patriots Notebook 8/14: Receiver Battle is Getting Interesting
Patriots vs. Colts Quick Reactions: An Undisciplined Performance
Vrabel on Gonzalez’s Absence: CB is “Physically Unavailable”
Back
Top