Tonight showed that in the playoffs if the offense struggles the defense is really not capable of being able to pull put a win. I am assuming that the team the Pats face in the playoffs will not be playing with a quarterback making their first NFL start, and make them pay for their poor play at times.
Wat :bricks:
Tonight showed the exact opposite of that. The offense really scored 17 points. Another 7 came from a ridiculous ST play. The offense got to punch it in, but that was due to ST. And the defense got 7.
The defense played awful, but starting the 4th quarter, made a huge goal line stand to force GB to settle for a FG instead of a huge TD. In case you didn't notice, that difference was also the difference in the game.
The offense took over and kicked a field goal, but the team was still trailing.
The defense then shut down GB, forcing a 3-and-out.
The offense took over, and finally took the lead with a TD.
The defense then gave up one first down, then force a punt 3 plays later.
Then our offense went 3-and-out, setting up the final drive, where they managed to hold. The Packers ran 6 times for 23 yards. When passing, they went 3 for 4 for 22 yards, sacked twice, and had an INT called back. Hardly a poor performance.
The only reason it was so close to a TD was our offense's 3-and-out gave the ball back to GB at their own 43.
When the defense dominates, you complain they can't win a close game. When they get tested throughout a close game, you complain that they can't win when the offense is off. But they did. How you can make that claim after last night is beyond me. It was ugly, no doubt. But they turned it around in the 4th quarter of a close game and found a way.
You can say they sucked. Just don't say they can't win when the offense struggles RIGHT AFTER WE ALL SAW THEM DO IT.