wasn't jax supposed to smoke the pats? - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum > Visiting Locker Room
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-05-2008, 10:24 PM   #1
eom
In the Starting Line-up
 
eom's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,535
My Mood: Asleep
Default wasn't jax supposed to smoke the pats?

ahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!
eom is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 01-05-2008, 10:43 PM   #2
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 

Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 938
Default Re: wasn't jax supposed to smoke the pats?

It's always dangerous to look at one game and think you understand a team (e.g., Pats against Baltimore). But JAX will need to be much better to beat the Pats, and you can be sure the Pats will not replicate the strange decision-making and playcalling by Pittsburgh.
onegameatatime is offline  
Old 01-06-2008, 07:42 AM   #3
Banned
 

Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 13
Default Re: wasn't jax supposed to smoke the pats?

I think they actually line up with you all pretty well--in particular, Rashean Mathis on Moss. If Henderson is healthy, it's going to be a good game, especially now that Garrard has had his bad game. Look to see a lot of Fred Taylor and Pocket Hercules next week.....
BackBayBilly is offline  
Old 01-06-2008, 07:46 AM   #4
In the Starting Line-up
 
italian pat patriot's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Italy
Posts: 3,800
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: wasn't jax supposed to smoke the pats?

JAX will need to play at best to have a chance against us (imho)
italian pat patriot is offline  
Old 01-06-2008, 07:48 AM   #5
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 

Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,464
Default Re: wasn't jax supposed to smoke the pats?

Quote:
Originally Posted by eom View Post
ahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!
Does this count as an actual post?

I'm still trying to figure out what it actually means. Since the Jags just won a game are we to infer that they looked too weak in winning? Hmmm, playoff game on the road, a win isn't good enough unless you win by 30?

By that rule the Pats looked pretty bad in the Meadowlands.

So what are you saying, Mr. eom? Your message is garbled, unintelligible, and stunted.
FrontSeven is offline  
Old 01-06-2008, 09:10 AM   #6
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 601
Default Re: wasn't jax supposed to smoke the pats?

a bit of a difference ...a playoff game and and the pats playing the giants. in the playoffs both teams have pressure...the giants had no pressure..and when they did...... they crumbled.

jax is the same team they were when we smoked them.

next opp please ...although i am not quite sure chargers will beat tenn.
nowayback is offline  
Old 01-06-2008, 09:14 AM   #7
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
Rob0729's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 25,370
Default Re: wasn't jax supposed to smoke the pats?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BackBayBilly View Post
I think they actually line up with you all pretty well--in particular, Rashean Mathis on Moss. If Henderson is healthy, it's going to be a good game, especially now that Garrard has had his bad game. Look to see a lot of Fred Taylor and Pocket Hercules next week.....
I think the Jags defense is actually a poor match up with the Pats' offense. The Jags have a tendency to give up the big play and also relies a lot of their front pressure to hide weaknesses in the secondary. The Pats will spread out the offense and create mismatches against the Jags secondary. Brady isn't Roethlisberger. I don't see him getting sacked six times and getting rattled because he is forced to stay in the pocket.
Rob0729 is offline  
Old 01-06-2008, 09:20 AM   #8
Banned
 

Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 13
Default Re: wasn't jax supposed to smoke the pats?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob0729 View Post
I think the Jags defense is actually a poor match up with the Pats' offense. The Jags have a tendency to give up the big play and also relies a lot of their front pressure to hide weaknesses in the secondary. The Pats will spread out the offense and create mismatches against the Jags secondary. Brady isn't Roethlisberger. I don't see him getting sacked six times and getting rattled because he is forced to stay in the pocket.
Perhaps, but I still like Mathis on Moss. That may free up Welker, but they'll need to come up with a scheme to try to prevent that--not easy, I know. They can bring the pressure, however, and while I agree Tom isn't Ben, even Tom can occasionally get rattled with pressure.

I also think that their steady diet of Fred and J-D may do wonders to keep your O off the field, especially if it's close late in the game (which admittedly may be a stretch) when the age of your LB's may start to show.
BackBayBilly is offline  
Old 01-06-2008, 09:27 AM   #9
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 

Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 636
Default Re: wasn't jax supposed to smoke the pats?

The Pats offense is superior to that of the Colts and they couldn't beat them.
Belichick is better than DelRio and has had time to prepare. I would take Jacksonville a lot more seriously if they could beat the Colts.
flasox27 is offline  
Old 01-06-2008, 09:30 AM   #10
In the Starting Line-up
 
oldskool138's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,558
My Mood: Goofy
Default Re: wasn't jax supposed to smoke the pats?

Quote:
Originally Posted by flasox27 View Post
The Pats offense is superior to that of the Colts and they couldn't beat them.
Belichick is better than DelRio and has had time to prepare. I would take Jacksonville a lot more seriously if they could beat the Colts.
News Flash: The Pats beat the Colts this year.
__________________
You can't be two feet tall and expect to take over the world...unless you're Doug Flutie. -MST3K
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"You're all a bunch yahoos, hero worshipers and gutless suck-ups." - Tony Massarotti
oldskool138 is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC