- Joined
- Mar 19, 2006
- Messages
- 34,872
- Reaction score
- 15,420
Right.
And why haven't you seen a Pats team not contend this century (2008 notwithstanding)? We have #12 and his coach. The bar for success is nothing less than rings with those two. So it's all about giving us the team the best chance to win TODAY. Not next year. Not when a certain QB project becomes Steve Young....lolololol. Today.
Spin it, slice it, dice it, mix it up all ya want.. this is a win now team with Brady and BB. While the bar is at "rings"... winning now is what it's all about. Period. That is not an opinion, that is a fact. There really isn't any point trying to argue against what is fact.
Now about this so called "panic" and why some like me think it's important to try and WIN NOW... First of all Brady is 36 not 35. I know we all want Brady to be here forever but that just won't happen. Joe Montana's last season in the NFL was when he was 38. John Elway's last season was when he was 37. So was Marino's. So was Steve Young's. So was Jim Kelly's. Aikman and Bledsoe were only 34 (although they could have stuck around). The decline is inevitable, it happens to all the greats. Father Time spares nobody. Brady can talk as much as he wants about playing till he's in his 40's, and I certainly hope he does if he keeps playing at this level... but I don't think he wants to end his career looking like a horse that needs to be taken behind the barn. He's a competitor, with nothing left to prove.
I don't want to know what this team will look like with no QB after Brady goes.
The future looks ugly in that area. So while #12 and the coach is here and #12 is playing at a high level for however longer that lasts, I wanna see them have the best team possible to get at least one more ring.
Translation: Win now, please.
Yup.
As I've said, every year this has been a WIN NOW team. I've never seen this team give up on a season, and that includes when Brady was out for a full year, and Matt Cassel won 11 freaking games.
You, as a fan, may believe that the magical combination of Brady and Belichick defines the boundaries of the franchise's history, or at least the future boundary thereof. When Brady's no longer an option, this team will continue. BB knows this.
I do think there's some "WIN NOW" urgency that comes with that, but thus far, it has not been so much that it's become an excuse for inevitable bad decisions that come with monomania. And that's a good thing.
I'm not a Tebowite. In fact, I'll be relieved if BB/Josh give up on the Tebow project 8/31. On the other hand, if they go through with trying to work w/him after 8/31 (i.e., don't cut him,) it won't be the end of my world.
I think the Packers still wanted to "WIN NOW" with Favrevrah when they drafted Aaron Rodgers. ::shrug:: It was certainly not enough that they didn't make the pick, despite having Mr. Emo at the helm, and it was not enough that they didn't move forward with Rodgers when Favrevrah yanked their chain once too often.
Don't get it twisted; of course Brady's shown no such tendencies, and of course I fully expect him to take his last snap in a Patriots uniform. In fact, he looks to be the type that'll grind on at least a few more years (although there are no guarantees in this game).
However, you and I differ in that you claim to understand the mood (and "mode") of the team's leadership, and not only that, to speak for them.
I think if there's one thing that's been constant with the BB-led Patriots, it's that he understands the probabilistic nature of the future, and moves in such a way not only to maximize obvious assets, but also to protect against downside risk.
That means that "WIN NOW" in BB-land will always include consideration of future seasons. If they think that a roster spot and a couple hundred grand in cap space is a small enough price to pay for X% chance of a high upside return, while it makes me really nervous, it doesn't crush my world.
As I said, I don't think Tebow makes it past 8/31. I do not yet have evidence of BB's opinion to that effect. I will have it, or not, on 9/1. I'm in no hurry. If you are, okay. Honestly, the odds are that he is gone. But the probability, as in all things, is not 100%.
From your point of view, you can get the "I shouted it loudest" prize if Tebow is cut, which isn't that difficult a thing to do. The downside risk is that you get the "Biggest idiot" award if for some reason you're wrong.
From my point of view, I get neither, and want neither. It just seems more honest to say I don't know, because that's the fact.
PFnV












