Re: Why are we pissed at the defense? The offense is responsible vs. BUF, DAL, and t
The more your defense is on the field, the more points you cost your team.
Remember that saying "time is money" - in this case "time is points".
When your offense averages a point per minute, as this offense does going into yesterday, every minute your defense is on the field above the norm, you've, in essence, cost your team a point.
Had the Gost field goal gone through the uprights, this Patriots offense would've put up 20 points in 20 minutes - which is true to its average. It also would've put up 20 points in 8 possessions (discounting the final hail mary drive), which if I had to guess is just slightly below its average as well.
So while some on this forum intend to suggest it doesn't matter how long a drive the defense yields if it ends up being 3 points instead of 7 - yes, as a matter of fact it does.
I actually intend to start a thread on this issue - breaking off the discussion more on the idea of bend don't break and how it affects win probability. But I'll probably have to wait until at least Wednesday when this forum has calmed down.
The bottom line is - no, the offense did not look great yesterday, and it was not executing perfectly. But it basically played about 75% of what it normally plays, and it played much closer to norms than people here are giving credit for. So it's hard to place blame on a unit that performs just slightly below norm against a high caliber defense, but just performs less often.
Brady can take the blame if he wants, and the two 3 and outs were brutal, situationally - but the real reason we lost yesterday is the defense couldn't get off the field, even when it put itself in ideal situations - 3rd and long.