- Joined
- Dec 21, 2007
- Messages
- 26,990
- Reaction score
- 21,890
What kinda math was that from pagano.? I dont get it.
Yep, made no sense. I'm glad he did it
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.What kinda math was that from pagano.? I dont get it.
Luck > Wilson by a decent margin
Swap them on their respective teams, and you'd see there's a difference in their talent level.
In terms of raw talent, and that means not including their teams, and just the individual
Luck is an A - Wilson is a B at best.
I'll state my case, it's all I can do.
Wilson vs. Luck
TDs: Wilson
Yards: Luck
Y/A: Wilson
Comp pct: Wilson
QBR: Wilson
Wins: Wilson
PPG: Wilson
Playoff wins/stats: Wilson
Rice/Tate/marshawn/bad OL vs. Wayne/Hilton/bad OL
Marshawn before and after Wilson
I understand why people like Lucks potential, but Wilson is overlooked.
I'll state my case, it's all I can do.
Wilson vs. Luck
TDs: Wilson
Yards: Luck
Y/A: Wilson
Comp pct: Wilson
QBR: Wilson
Wins: Wilson
PPG: Wilson
Playoff wins/stats: Wilson
Rice/Tate/marshawn/bad OL vs. Wayne/Hilton/bad OL
Marshawn before and after Wilson
I understand why people like Lucks potential, but Wilson is overlooked.
The 2 point conversion would'v put them within a TD and field goal as oppose to 2 TD's I believe.
All these things are a function of team football not solely a measure of how talented a QB is.Wilson vs. Luck
TDs: Wilson
Y/A: Wilson
Comp pct: Wilson
QBR: Wilson
Wins: Wilson
PPG: Wilson
Playoff wins/stats: Wilson
I know we all have our binkies but Luck is the best young Quarterback in the NFL by a country mile.
| 10 | 876 |
| 8 | 524 |
| 6 | 353 |
| 4 | 294 |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 8 - April 23 (Through 26yrs)











