StockingAnarchyNumber12
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2016
- Messages
- 4,409
- Reaction score
- 6,800
People are too hard on Harry.For comparison...Joey ****ing Galloway did more per game in his 3 games as a Patriot than Harry
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.People are too hard on Harry.For comparison...Joey ****ing Galloway did more per game in his 3 games as a Patriot than Harry
People are too hard on Harry.
I agree his rookie season wasn't good, but multiple factors make it hard to completely judge him. Stuff like, injuries, missing games, being a rookie, etc. I don't disagree with the stance, but I want to see if Harry can develop. Fingers crossed!How so, given his terrible rookie season?
I agree his rookie season wasn't good, but multiple factors make it hard to completely judge him. Stuff like, injuries, missing games, being a rookie, etc. I don't disagree with the stance, but I want to see if Harry can develop. Fingers crossed!
I hope he does.We shouldn’t judge him until next season. Being placed on IR for half the year stunted his rookie season. If he doesn’t progress after a full offseason then it’s fair to call him a bust.
Seriously, is there a single person in the NFL with the title of WR scout? The Patriots very, very clearly organize things by geographic region rather than position, and the handful of other teams that I just looked up do it the same way.Fire our WR scouts
Why on earth would you compare Joey "****ing" Galloway with Harry?
No need trying to make sense of it, the comparison is irrelevant -- a rookie off IR and a veteran from 10 years ago. Just @FCB02062 trying hard to be anti-Patriots negative as usual and looking foolish, with some profanity thrown so he feels like a "tough guy."Maybe because at age 38 Galloway looked just about as fast as a 22 year old N'Keal Harry?
To be fair Galloway caught 7 passes in 3 games for the Pats for 2.33 catches per game.
Meanwhile Harry caught 12 passes in 7 games for 1.77 catches per game.
I mean the numbers are pretty similar but Galloway was a veteran so that accounts for that extra .6 catches per game, right?
Maybe because at age 38 Galloway looked just about as fast as a 22 year old N'Keal Harry?
To be fair Galloway caught 7 passes in 3 games for the Pats for 2.33 catches per game.
Meanwhile Harry caught 12 passes in 7 games for 1.77 catches per game.
I mean the numbers are pretty similar but Galloway was a veteran so that accounts for that extra .6 catches per game, right?
You’re forgetting that Jackson was dealing with a hamstring injury which forced him to miss all of training camp but played as early as week 2. The other guy laughably went on IR for that and missed more than 9 weeks. Jackson at least averaged more than 10 yards a catch. He also drew a few PI’s going deep. The other guy can barely run.Both barely showed anything their rookie years. Harry at least has the added excuse of missing the first 2 months due to injury.
You’re forgetting that Jackson was dealing with a hamstring injury which forced him to miss all of training camp but played as early as week 2. The other guy laughably went on IR for that and missed more than 9 weeks. Jackson at least averaged more than 10 yards a catch. He also drew a few PI’s going deep. The other guy can barely run.
The one thing they have in common is that they both don’t look like fits for Tom Brady.
There was no IR designated to return for up to 2 players when Jackson played. Harry was dealing with a bad ankle all training camp before aggravating it in the preseason. He didn’t return to practice until week 7. Not sure why it’s laugable, it made sense to put him on IR for roughly the same amount of time it would’ve taken to heal and free up a roster spot.