This is where we gather to follow things on Game Day. Obviously, emotions tend to be high so if anyone gets a little crazy, the use of the “Mute” button is encouraged on anyone who may be annoying to you to control your experience and to allow the moderators to also enjoy the game.
At the same time, please take a deep breath before over-reacting for the sake of making this a pleasant experience for everyone.
Lastly, we have never allowed promoting the use of any illegal streaming. This is illegal and will be enforced by copyright holders, which puts this site at risk. DO NOT POST ANY LINKS to those platforms.
This also means, there absolutely cannot be any mention these platforms, spaces, special characters, etc. - so do not get creative in trying to work around this request.
If you do you will have your account suspended.
I do not have the means to deal with legal issues and have already been contacted previously, so this absolutely needs to be adhered to. If you see any illegal links, please report them so a mod can remove them.
i think that was smart of D-mac ... i think Vince would of fumbled that.. and people saying d-mac is playing horrible? he has gone against top 10 , maybe 5 receivers and is playing tough
The problem is that people don't see the plays he has perfect coverage and the opposing QB doesn't throw in his direction because of it. They see the handful of bad plays and get peissed. It is the Matt Light syndrome.
Totally agree. Look at SD's defense? They are supposed to be elite, and they just look terrible out there making just silly mistakes like leaving the sideline totally open to Branch.
Agree. But still I think it was a bad play. Just not as bad. A fumble there isnt a big deal. A fumble probably means the end of the half. A penalty should have ended the half but for a gift from the Chargers.
But in the end if he was thinking about the play and made a judgment at least it means he is trying to make plays.
Branch was a decent receiver in Seattle, they just didn't know how to use him to the fullest of his abilities. And the rest of the offense sucked too, which is never a help.
First of all, McCourty wasn't thinking that when he tackled the guy. Second, if he did, it would be faulty logic. Why would you tackle a guy & almost assuredly cost your team 3 points instead of taking the chance that Wilfork doesn't fumble and you are almost guaranteed 3 points - and what's the worst that could happen? Chargers recover the fumble? Why not tail him & look to recover a possible fumble?
as far as im concernd, they didnt need to give up 7 points, our secondery is a bunch of midgets (i love them and i know they can do better) and its not very helpfull...when a DT is making a one-handed INT san diego's "expolosive offense" should be flushed in a toilet.
