PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

The 3-year transition Brady/Garoppollo theory - is there any merit?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Very true. I just don't see the need that some do to slight Brady while doing so...
Who's slighting Brady? The fact of the matter is that he is geetting older, Father Time is eventually going to win, and it's important to have a replacement on hand. These aren't slights, they are little things called FACTS.
 
Why do people want to unquestioningly, unthinkingly assume that Brady will with near-absolute certainty do something no one else in NFL history has ever done? (Well, I know why -- it's because they're fans who aren't responsible for a single damned thing about the operation of an actual football team and so can follow their hearts wherever they go with zero consequences.)

Actual managers who actually have to run and be responsible for things can't let themselves go into flights of fancy. Rather, they need to consider things coldly and hedge bets.

I'm not saying Brady is going to shrivel up and die in two years. I'm saying that unlike the homertastic (Bradytastic?) people here, Belichick has to plan for the possibility that Brady isn't going to last as long as Brady thinks he will and not just unquestionably assume it to be true.

I would go even beyond the idea that Brady might still be great 4-5 years from now. It all has to do with how much of a dropoff it is from Brady to Garoppollo, or more precisely, the value of Garoppollo. Garoppollo looked REALLY good in his six quarters. I know that is a small sample size, but the Patriots evaluate both players on a daily basis in practice.

So I think that even if Brady could play at a high level for the next 3-5 years, the Patriots still might be strongly leaning towards replacing him with Garoppollo, who might be able to play the position very well for the next 12-15 years.

Would want the best quarterback in football for the next 3-5 years, or a guy who may be among the best quarterbacks in football for the next decade and a half? Please don't take these evaluations literally, as I'm not saying that's what Garoppollo would be, but there is certainly the possibility that this has more to do with Garoppollo's evaluation than Brady's. I doubt the team thinks Brady will fall off a cliff; I also doubt they see him playing in 2024, whereas in that year Garoppollo may be leading them to championship contention while still having many years left.

I think many people are not looking at this the way they need to be. It's not that Brady is going to suddenly suck, and we need to replace him with anyone who is decent and can run the offense. It's that we might have a great franchise quarterback (which is so difficult to find and everything in today's NFL) who is young, would be here long-term, and has way more potential longevity at the position. I doubt Garoppollo will be "better" than Brady at any point while they are both with the team; that doesn't mean that choosing him long-term is the wrong decision.
 
Last edited:
Why do people want to unquestioningly, unthinkingly assume that Brady will with near-absolute certainty do something no one else in NFL history has ever done? (Well, I know why -- it's because they're fans who aren't responsible for a single damned thing about the operation of an actual football team and so can follow their hearts wherever they go with zero consequences.)

Actual managers who actually have to run and be responsible for things can't let themselves go into flights of fancy. Rather, they need to consider things coldly and hedge bets.

I'm not saying Brady is going to shrivel up and die in two years. I'm saying that unlike the homertastic (Bradytastic?) people here, Belichick has to plan for the possibility that Brady isn't going to last as long as Brady thinks he will and not just unquestionably assume it to be true.

Strawman argument, unless you can find anyone who doesn't think Belichick shouldn't have a capable back up for Brady, and options for the future. The real debate we have been having is whether they should keep Garrapolo to be that back-up, which means franchising Garrapolo next offseason, and then moving Brady to allow Garrapolo to take over, which clearly assumes he will be a franchise QB. The other choice is moving Garrapolo if the offer is good enough, which imo would require a top 15 pick in this draft as well as a high pick next year. Others have different ideas but I'll just keep this to my parameters. I would do this deal because I believe Brady was the best player in football this season and will repeat that performance, or will actually surpass it, which with Gronk back and Cooks here is actually what I believe will happen. I get the take that QB's decline in their late 30's and early forties, but I buy into the idea that Brady is not like other QBs because his arc is on the upswing when it should be going down, his training is like no QB before him, and his game is not based upon his athleticism, which would almost certainly mean a decline, but instead is based upon his football IQ and his accuracy, neither of which should suffer because of age. I think Brady is 100% right in saying he has all the answers to the test, so as long as he can read defense's and hit open receivers he will be a very good QB, and unlike the believers in Kellerman's Cliff I believe Brady will be able to read defense's and get the ball to his receivers for another 4-5 seasons. And imo age won't be the reason he retires, I think he will step down in 4-5 years because he feels it's time. We will see who is right but at this point the debate is pretty much at a standstill because I'm not going to change my beliefs on Brady and you aren't going to stop believing in Kellerman's Cliff.
 
Decline is rarely uniform. I suspect that whenever it happens, Brady's last year in New England will be marked by a few games that are vintage Brady -- followed by an increasing number of uncharacteristically poor performances. What that means is that no matter when you cut ties with TB12, there will be enough mixed signals that a lot of fans are going to second-guess the decision.

Speaking of which -- how about that latest Superbowl. Full of TB12 mixed signals, wouldn't you say? We were pretty fortunate that vintage Brady re-emerged in the 4th quarter. But we wouldn't have needed it if he hadn't been definitely-not-vintage-Brady in the first 3. juuuuuuust saying. Just because Kellerman's an idiot doesn't mean that TB12 is not declining. Well done to TB12 for putting the team on his back and atoning like a madman, but Brady in his prime doesn't put the team in a hole like that in the first place.

Nonsense. Brady's performance in the first 3 quarters had absolutely zero to do with his age.

I get the sense some people - not you just in general...let's just say wouldn't mind that much if the decline of the GOAT happens sooner than later so their binky backup QB can take over.... a guy who hasn't proven or done squat in this league to date.

Very odd.
 
Exactly. The ball is in Brady's court now. If he can keep playing at a high level, he'll be the starter, But at his current age, it would be absolutely and utterly negligent of Belichick not to have a plan in place for when old age catches up with him. He may be a freak but father time will win in the end.
I agree, but I also don't think the odds that Brady plays for at least 3 more years at a high level are all that absurd. Obviously, his diet and fitness program have merits. But also, the "falls off fast" argument ignores other existing problems with other old-age QBs: Manning was internally decapitated, Favre died in Minnesota in **** pic disgrace, etc... And sometimes, they just don't want to put in the effort anymore. I don't see Brady having that problem.

To me, the thing that would derail Brady in a swift, sudden way would be an injury *knocks violently on wooden desk*.
 
Garoppollo looked REALLY good in his six quarters.

He looked very good for having no expectations. But not nearly good enough where I think the Pats should consider showing the GOAT the door in the near future, or close the door on the possibility that they should look for a QB in next year's class to be the heir to Brady.
 
Last edited:
Nonsense. Brady's performance in the first 3 quarters had absolutely zero to do with his age.

I get the sense some people - not you just in general...let's just say wouldn't mind that much if the decline of the GOAT happens sooner than later so their binky backup QB can take over.... a guy who hasn't proven or done squat in this league to date.

Very odd.
I can't think of anyone here who has Garoppolo for a binky. But some of us are glad to see that the Patriots are actually engaging in longterm planning and have an option in hand for when the Brady era ends. Because anyone capable of thinking ahead by more than 5 minutes or so sees that the Brady era only has a few years left in it.

I for one am glad to see that continuity planning has been done, and if that continuity plan costs us the last 2-3 seasons of a great but declining player... sometimes that's the price you pay for extending a dynasty past the era of its original principal.

BB is trying to do something no one has ever done -- keep a dynasty not only going but going strong and managing a handoff between last generation's quarterback and next generation's quarterback smoothly enough that the winning is not interrupted. I don't think very many franchises in the entirety of the NFL have accomplished that, if any have done it at all. If BB pulls it off, that's just one more in his massive list of career accomplishments. I for one am looking forward to seeing how he manages it.
 
I can't think of anyone here who has Garoppolo for a binky. But some of us are glad to see that the Patriots are actually engaging in longterm planning and have an option in hand for when the Brady era ends. Because anyone capable of thinking ahead by more than 5 minutes or so sees that the Brady era only has a few years left in it.

I for one am glad to see that continuity planning has been done, and if that continuity plan costs us the last 2-3 seasons of a great but declining player... sometimes that's the price you pay for extending a dynasty past the era of its original principal.

BB is trying to do something no one has ever done -- keep a dynasty not only going but going strong and managing a handoff between last generation's quarterback and next generation's quarterback smoothly enough that the winning is not interrupted. I don't think very many franchises in the entirety of the NFL have accomplished that, if any have done it at all. If BB pulls it off, that's just one more in his massive list of career accomplishments. I for one am looking forward to seeing how he manages it.

Well, I think we all know by now that if there's any coach and team that can make these tough decisions, can make a franchise altering decision like this one would be - it's this coach and team. It's not like he hasn't done it before. I don't think any of us can say with any certainty what he has in mind to make that transition to the next era, who is involved and how it will be done.
 
Why do people want to unquestioningly, unthinkingly assume that Brady will with near-absolute certainty do something no one else in NFL history has ever done? .


Because of the data that his measurables are IMPROVING. You are the one assuming his physical condition is currently deteriorating. The facts say you are wrong. IMO BB will do nothing until his measurables fall off.
 
But some of us are glad to see that the Patriots are actually engaging in longterm planning and have an option in hand for when the Brady era ends. Because anyone capable of thinking ahead by more than 5 minutes or so sees that the Brady era only has a few years left in it..

If by "few" you mean "5", then we're on the same page.

I think it's critical to have a QB to take over for Brady when he retires (or his skills start to significantly decline). And the time to start doing this is now, 5 years before the expected event. Unfortunately Garapolo is unlikely to be available to take over then so I wouldn't be counting on him to be the next Patriots QB.

The reason many (obviously including Tom Brady) believe he'll still be playing at a high level in 3 years despite the lack of history of others doing that is because NO FOOTBALL PLAYER has EVER worked on his conditioning, strength, flexibility and overall health the way the Tom Brady has. Therefore, comparing Tom Brady to other QBs isn't real useful in figuring out what's going to happen. We do have 1 baseball player who did SOME of what Tom Brady does - his name is Nolan Ryan and he retired at the age of 46 while still throwing blazing fastballs at the major league level. So the only evidence we have is that if you do the right things to maintain your body, you CAN play at a very high level into your mid-40s.
 
Here is my summary of the three-year transition theory, with its general premise and key recent moves that make it a reasonable, though not neceassily correct, hypothesis. It's hard to predict the future, even for the Patriots, so I'm not saying they are clairvoyant and anything is set in stone. So many things happen in the NFL - major injuries, shocking surprises, bad evaluations of all types, etc. However, the 3-year theory posits the Patriots are preparing for the most likely events that will happen in the future in order to remain a powerhouse with Brady and a potential powerhouse when he departs.

1. The main premise of the 3-year theory is that Tom Brady's last seasons with the team will be in 2017 and 2018 and Jimmy Garoppollo will be the starter in 2019. Brady is signed through the 2019 season, and here is where the devil is in the details. Brady carries a cap hit of just $7M if released in 2019. That number is $28M in 2017 and $14M in 2018. In other words, moving on from his contract in 2019 would not cripple the franchise other than a speed bump. They could also trade him for other assets. Brady's father has acknowledged that this is going to be a bad ending, with Brady wanting to play longer and the team finding too much risk, at his advanced age, of bipassing a long-term replacement for what may be 1-2 more seasons from Brady at age 43 and 44. Brady's father also referenced that the Patriots found a great young QB in Garoppollo. I believe Adam Schefter has the scoop right that Jimmy Garoppollo will NOT be traded this offseason, despite Mary Kay Cabot's questionable reports that the Patriots are open for business.

2. The fact that Brady's 2018 season could be his last one, based on a contract extension with 2019 providing the team with a relatively small cap hit in releasing him, may not be a coincidence. It lines up exactly with a transition plan with the team's options for Jimmy Garoppollo. The Patriots can franchise Garroppollo in 2018 and sign him to a long term extension for 2019 and beyond. Did you note that in this scenario, Garoppollo would be the starting his long-term deal in the exact same year the Patriots could move on from Brady? At this point, Brady would be 42 and Garoppollo 27. In this scenario, the Patriots fully control the rights to both Brady and Garoppollo.

3. This scenario may make people scoff about the uncomfortable 2018 season, with Brady playing quarterback for less money than his franchised backup. Certainly that would be strange and may lead to some big issues, but is one unorthodox, uncomfortable, and strange season worth having a great QB for the next 10-15 years? In some ways it would be the classic mad scientist Belichick going against all conventional wisdom and Brady once again proving to be the impeccable team player. Of course, Brady might react differently and want to be traded if this happened. I remind you, though, that if Jimmy Garoppollo ever becomes the team's starting QB while Brady is still wanting to play, there's going to be an ugly ending, and there is no way around it. There's no way around it because Brady's contract options and Garoppollo's contract options necessitate a big clash in 2018. Garoppollo is not signing a dumb deal to stay on as backup until Brady decides to quit, so the franchise tag will be necessary to retain him, while Brady is still the starting quarterback. Given Garoppollo's clear ability to play well in this offense, it would be very difficult for the Patriots to get rid of him, after going through a lot of backups over the years who gp ever played close to as good a game as JG played against Arizona and a half against Miami.

4. The Patriots realize that Brady is the greatest quarterback of all-time and playing at an insane level for his age. They have also seen Peyton Manning and Brett Farve recently produce all-world seasons, only to be essentially finished within just one calendar year. Sure, Brady is a unique case with a legendary conditioning program, but every NFL player falls off fast. At some point it will happen to Brady, inevitably. However, their recent moves seem intent on maximizing Brady's championship caliber roster while they still have him playing at a high level, even if it means the rebuilding process with Garoppollo might take some time as they are giving up draft picks to "win now." They are betting on Brady for the next two years. This offseason has been a major departure from their typical standard operating procedure. The Cooks deal in particular lines up well with the two year window theory, as he is likely here for two years before wanting a monster deal. The Gilmore deal might go beyond the Butler vs Gilmore value. It may also have to do with the one in hand, two in the bush saying. They wanted to secure a top cornerback for the next few years, and Gilmore was ready to take the deal, while the timing with Butler did not work out. They may not have wanted to risk losing Butler and being left with no elite corner, a major blow to championship contention.

5. To summarize, the Patriots would be giving Brady two loaded teams in 2017 and 2018 for a chance to add to his legacy but as of now, would find it too risky to count on his level of play continuing until he is 42/43 years old. Though Garoppollo won't be Brady, the vast amount of good/great/elite quarterback play they could get for 10-15 years far outweighs the limited later seasons of Brady's career, and it may even be worth it if Brady is still elite. Again, 15 years of stellar play versus a ticking time bomb for when Father Time inevitably wins.

6. I realize that many of these points are open to counter arguments and criticism for making assumptions. I think it is a reasonable theory - not a certain explanation- on the Patriots recent moves (or non-moves in the case of Jimmy G.) if we look at this in a more big picture way where the puzzle pieces all fit together.

This is basically what I have been saying. But I used a lot less words. I am surprised no one hit you with a big fat RED X.
 
I do not buy the narrative that Brady will one year "fall off the cliff" due to age. His playing style has never been very athletic and as long as avoids a devastating injury I do not see any reason why he cannot reach his mid 40's goal while continuing to play at an elite level. Not sure how applicable the comps to prior QB's are as none of them had Brady's fitness focus and/or played under the same QB friendly rules their entire career.

We have no idea whats going to happen as far as Brady's performance drop off. But if they don't trade JG this off season then that should tell you something.
 
To the folks who think Kraft or BB will trade Brady... remember the fan reaction to Kraft not standing four-square behind Brady during deflategate. That's barely a sniff of what would happen if Kraft allowed BB to trade Brady. He is not Bledsoe. He is not Bernie Kosar. He retires in New England by mutual consent of coach, owner, and GOAT, when they all agree the time is right. And not until. And not elsewhere.

I don't actually think this is correct. But I could be wrong.. I just can't see Brady playing on another team it would be very strange. I would have to root for another team. Unless he played the Patriots.
 
I would go even beyond the idea that Brady might still be great 4-5 years from now. It all has to do with how much of a dropoff it is from Brady to Garoppollo, or more precisely, the value of Garoppollo. Garoppollo looked REALLY good in his six quarters. I know that is a small sample size, but the Patriots evaluate both players on a daily basis in practice.

So I think that even if Brady could play at a high level for the next 3-5 years, the Patriots still might be strongly leaning towards replacing him with Garoppollo, who might be able to play the position very well for the next 12-15 years.

Would want the best quarterback in football for the next 3-5 years, or a guy who may be among the best quarterbacks in football for the next decade and a half? Please don't take these evaluations literally, as I'm not saying that's what Garoppollo would be, but there is certainly the possibility that this has more to do with Garoppollo's evaluation than Brady's. I doubt the team thinks Brady will fall off a cliff; I also doubt they see him playing in 2024, whereas in that year Garoppollo may be leading them to championship contention while still having many years left.

I think many people are not looking at this the way they need to be. It's not that Brady is going to suddenly suck, and we need to replace him with anyone who is decent and can run the offense. It's that we might have a great franchise quarterback (which is so difficult to find and everything in today's NFL) who is young, would be here long-term, and has way more potential longevity at the position. I doubt Garoppollo will be "better" than Brady at any point while they are both with the team; that doesn't mean that choosing him long-term is the wrong decision.

Of course the other side of the shoe is this... firstly trading Brady is going to cause fan outrage.. he is a legend now. Secondly if they trade Brady and JG steps in and sucks up the joint while Brady continues to have 3-4 more years of MVP type play with another team... That would be very bad for Bill.

Not only did you trade away the guy that has helped forge the New England Patriots into one of the best sports franchises to ever exist but then to replace him with Just another guy potentially?

If Bill made that trade or moved on from Brady while he still has gas left in the tank he better be damn sure that his replacement is at least good.
 
He looked very good for having no expectations. But not nearly good enough where I think the Pats should consider showing the GOAT the door in the near future, or close the door on the possibility that they should look for a QB in next year's class to be the heir to Brady.

The only way I could see them showing Brady the door would be in 2019 or if he suffers a major injury before that. But we all know holding on to JG will be very costly in 2018..
 
Here is my summary of the three-year transition theory, with its general premise and key recent moves that make it a reasonable, though not neceassily correct, hypothesis. It's hard to predict the future, even for the Patriots, so I'm not saying they are clairvoyant and anything is set in stone. So many things happen in the NFL - major injuries, shocking surprises, bad evaluations of all types, etc. However, the 3-year theory posits the Patriots are preparing for the most likely events that will happen in the future in order to remain a powerhouse with Brady and a potential powerhouse when he departs.

1. The main premise of the 3-year theory is that Tom Brady's last seasons with the team will be in 2017 and 2018 and Jimmy Garoppollo will be the starter in 2019. Brady is signed through the 2019 season, and here is where the devil is in the details. Brady carries a cap hit of just $7M if released in 2019. That number is $28M in 2017 and $14M in 2018. In other words, moving on from his contract in 2019 would not cripple the franchise other than a speed bump. They could also trade him for other assets. Brady's father has acknowledged that this is going to be a bad ending, with Brady wanting to play longer and the team finding too much risk, at his advanced age, of bipassing a long-term replacement for what may be 1-2 more seasons from Brady at age 43 and 44. Brady's father also referenced that the Patriots found a great young QB in Garoppollo. I believe Adam Schefter has the scoop right that Jimmy Garoppollo will NOT be traded this offseason, despite Mary Kay Cabot's questionable reports that the Patriots are open for business.

2. The fact that Brady's 2018 season could be his last one, based on a contract extension with 2019 providing the team with a relatively small cap hit in releasing him, may not be a coincidence. It lines up exactly with a transition plan with the team's options for Jimmy Garoppollo. The Patriots can franchise Garroppollo in 2018 and sign him to a long term extension for 2019 and beyond. Did you note that in this scenario, Garoppollo would be the starting his long-term deal in the exact same year the Patriots could move on from Brady? At this point, Brady would be 42 and Garoppollo 27. In this scenario, the Patriots fully control the rights to both Brady and Garoppollo.

3. This scenario may make people scoff about the uncomfortable 2018 season, with Brady playing quarterback for less money than his franchised backup. Certainly that would be strange and may lead to some big issues, but is one unorthodox, uncomfortable, and strange season worth having a great QB for the next 10-15 years? In some ways it would be the classic mad scientist Belichick going against all conventional wisdom and Brady once again proving to be the impeccable team player. Of course, Brady might react differently and want to be traded if this happened. I remind you, though, that if Jimmy Garoppollo ever becomes the team's starting QB while Brady is still wanting to play, there's going to be an ugly ending, and there is no way around it. There's no way around it because Brady's contract options and Garoppollo's contract options necessitate a big clash in 2018. Garoppollo is not signing a dumb deal to stay on as backup until Brady decides to quit, so the franchise tag will be necessary to retain him, while Brady is still the starting quarterback. Given Garoppollo's clear ability to play well in this offense, it would be very difficult for the Patriots to get rid of him, after going through a lot of backups over the years who gp ever played close to as good a game as JG played against Arizona and a half against Miami.

4. The Patriots realize that Brady is the greatest quarterback of all-time and playing at an insane level for his age. They have also seen Peyton Manning and Brett Farve recently produce all-world seasons, only to be essentially finished within just one calendar year. Sure, Brady is a unique case with a legendary conditioning program, but every NFL player falls off fast. At some point it will happen to Brady, inevitably. However, their recent moves seem intent on maximizing Brady's championship caliber roster while they still have him playing at a high level, even if it means the rebuilding process with Garoppollo might take some time as they are giving up draft picks to "win now." They are betting on Brady for the next two years. This offseason has been a major departure from their typical standard operating procedure. The Cooks deal in particular lines up well with the two year window theory, as he is likely here for two years before wanting a monster deal. The Gilmore deal might go beyond the Butler vs Gilmore value. It may also have to do with the one in hand, two in the bush saying. They wanted to secure a top cornerback for the next few years, and Gilmore was ready to take the deal, while the timing with Butler did not work out. They may not have wanted to risk losing Butler and being left with no elite corner, a major blow to championship contention.

5. To summarize, the Patriots would be giving Brady two loaded teams in 2017 and 2018 for a chance to add to his legacy but as of now, would find it too risky to count on his level of play continuing until he is 42/43 years old. Though Garoppollo won't be Brady, the vast amount of good/great/elite quarterback play they could get for 10-15 years far outweighs the limited later seasons of Brady's career, and it may even be worth it if Brady is still elite. Again, 15 years of stellar play versus a ticking time bomb for when Father Time inevitably wins.

6. I realize that many of these points are open to counter arguments and criticism for making assumptions. I think it is a reasonable theory - not a certain explanation- on the Patriots recent moves (or non-moves in the case of Jimmy G.) if we look at this in a more big picture way where the puzzle pieces all fit together.

Respect the take.

I took a similar approach at the topic here Occam's Razor applied to the JG situation.
 
It's also a game a small margins. A QB doesn't have to degrade a lot physically to have big differences in output. Lose just a few percent in velocity and now maybe the DBs are able to get to those passes that were jusssssst past their outstretched hands the year before, and so on.

I agree and disagree. I think the small margin applies more to athletic guys who are limited mentally. Daunte Culpepper, for instance, did not have to lose much to fall from reasonably effective to worthless. Manning, who's Brady's closest comparable, had to lose at least 30% of his velocity before he finally fell off the cliff. Even the remarkable 2013 season was him at 85%, tops. He also lost a good deal of his (already limited) mobility, which is why he spent so much time in shotgun.

Presuming a similar productivity/capability ratio, Brady is still a long way away from his personal cliff.

Oh, to answer the OP's question.... no, it doesn't have any merit.
 
Because of the data that his measurables are IMPROVING. You are the one assuming his physical condition is currently deteriorating. The facts say you are wrong. IMO BB will do nothing until his measurables fall off.

Off topic a bit: I loved your signature quote by the great, great Richard Feynman, summarizing the essence of science. Nicely done!
 
I would go even beyond the idea that Brady might still be great 4-5 years from now. It all has to do with how much of a dropoff it is from Brady to Garoppollo, or more precisely, the value of Garoppollo. Garoppollo looked REALLY good in his six quarters. I know that is a small sample size, but the Patriots evaluate both players on a daily basis in practice.

So I think that even if Brady could play at a high level for the next 3-5 years, the Patriots still might be strongly leaning towards replacing him with Garoppollo, who might be able to play the position very well for the next 12-15 years.

Would want the best quarterback in football for the next 3-5 years, or a guy who may be among the best quarterbacks in football for the next decade and a half? Please don't take these evaluations literally, as I'm not saying that's what Garoppollo would be, but there is certainly the possibility that this has more to do with Garoppollo's evaluation than Brady's. I doubt the team thinks Brady will fall off a cliff; I also doubt they see him playing in 2024, whereas in that year Garoppollo may be leading them to championship contention while still having many years left.

I think many people are not looking at this the way they need to be. It's not that Brady is going to suddenly suck, and we need to replace him with anyone who is decent and can run the offense. It's that we might have a great franchise quarterback (which is so difficult to find and everything in today's NFL) who is young, would be here long-term, and has way more potential longevity at the position. I doubt Garoppollo will be "better" than Brady at any point while they are both with the team; that doesn't mean that choosing him long-term is the wrong decision.
Your plan says cut brady to keep a guy who has played 6 quarters of decent football. It's ludicrous.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Former Patriots Super Bowl MVP Set to Announce Pick During Draft
TRANSCRIPT: Mike Vrabel’s Media Statement on Tuesday 4/21
MORSE: What Will the Patriots Do in the Draft?
MORSE: Patriots Prospects and 30 Visits
Patriots News 04-19, Countdown To Draft Day
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft 6 – A Week Before the Draft
TRANSCRIPT: Eliot Wolf Pre-Draft Press Conference 4/13
Patriots News 04-12, What To Watch For In The NFL Draft
MORSE: Pre-Draft Patriots News and Notes
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft 5
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft 5
Mark Morse
2 weeks ago
Back
Top