PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

That's great it starts with an earthquake

Status
Not open for further replies.
All of your criticisms stem from *1* game, despite your attempts to color them as long term trends. The offense had a bad day against Pittsburgh; kudos to their D. Do you really think it'll be like that for the rest of the season? Did you learn anything from their followup to the Browns game last year? Did you learn anything from the 30 points and 400+ yards they put up on a Jets D that handled them last year? The O had a bad day against a good D, and you're ready to blow it up.

No, it's not just 1 game. They needed an excellent late 4th quarter drive to come back to win the game at home against the Cowboys. It would seem the Cowboys also did favors for the Patriot defense in their play selection that the Steelers absolutely did not.

You can say "it's midseason, just wait" all you want, but there is a lot of truth to what many posters here (the critical ones) are saying. The Patriots have won a lot of regular season games and maybe even looked like SB contenders - yet we've seen two straight 1 and done losses in the playoffs at home. Is this type of thing going to happen again? That's really the heart of the angst here. We all want playoff wins, but are tempering our expectations because the team is showing signs (based on things we've seen in years past) that they may not be a strong contender. Further, most consider that a crying shame since we've got a once in a franchise history QB.
 
So you're OK with 'high school offense'? And characterizing the whole team as 'soft'? Just wondering. The 5 wins this year were just luck??

See, this is what the over-the-top homers do. They try to marginalize those they disagree with. That's fine. It's HOW you do it that is so ridiculous. You're crying about "high school offense"? Have you seen any high school games? The issue with soft? Go listen to Brady's words, go listen to the opponents, and think of what's generally meant by "soft" in the NFL. The 5 wins being "luck"... where did I ever say that?

This team wins because Tom Brady is the best in the business and he covers for a lot of flaws. What was once a "ground and pound, and toss in some WR screens" offense is now the Colts offense only moreso. What was once a "Bring it on. We'll give up some yards, but we'll beat the hell out of you while you get them" defense is now "take all the yards you want, but please don't embarrass us and please settle for field goals now and again".

And you'll refuse to give them any credit, and spend the next week focusing on the Gints 3rd down conversion rate, or their ypc. You aren't comfortable talking up the good points, only the negative stuff seems to catch your eye.

I talk up the good points all the time. It's people on both extremes who miss what I say, because they're always looking to be offended. I call it like I see it, and I try to see it pretty close to what it really is. You should try it sometime, instead of pretending that the stiffs in the defensive backfield are somehow all diamonds in the rough.

I see the 5-2 Giants, the 4-3 Jests, the 4-3 Chefs, and the 5-2 Bills on the upcoming schedule. If we do actually win some or all of those games, I'll be pretty pleased. You, of course, won't be unless we also shut them out.

Here's a perfect example of what I'm talking about. I'll be in the game threads. I'll be calling out the Chicken Littles. I'll be loving the wins every bit as much as you do. The difference is that, once the games are over, I'll look back at the games with an honest eye, instead of glossing over the things that didn't go as well as they should have. You'll be busy pretending the Pittsburgh beatdown didn't happen, and bleating about "where are all the haters now?".

There's that pessimism thing again. Those are the only 2 options? Maybe we might just outplay someone and win. It's possible. We have great personnel, especially on offense. We have a very young defense that played pretty well the previous 2 games, but not so much this past week. I think you tweak that - you and the OP want to blow it up. We'll just have to disagree on that, I guess.

Again you demonstrate some of the problems with the over-the-top homers. Pointing out the team's issues isn't pessimism. Noting that they don't match up well against some teams isn't pessimism. Noting that they'll need to get lucky to avoid those teams isn't pessimism. That's all just the way it is with this team.

As for tweak/blow up, that's just semantics. I'm honest enough to see that the defense has a lot of problems that have been around for a lot longer than one game, and that that offense has issues that weren't dealt with last year. You're willing to fool yourself into believing otherwise. How nice for you.
 
Last edited:
You're crying about "high school offense"? Have you seen any high school games?

Just a note - I'm not the one calling it a high school offense, the OP is. Apparently I'm the only one out here who sees that as ridiculous.

As for tweak/blow up, that's just semantics. I'm honest enough to see that the defense has a lot of problems that have been around for a lot longer than one game, and that that offense has issues that weren't dealt with last year. You're willing to fool yourself into believing otherwise. How nice for you.

Semantics? I say the Pats need to tighten things up a bit, you and the OP want to change the scheme and replace all the 'stiffs' in the defensive backfield. If I'm an over-the-top homer, you and the OP are over-the-top critics. Fair enough?
 
its getting abit annoying that anyone who doesnt succumb to the "sky is falling" thought process is a "homer"

realistically, we have alot of problems on defense...and unless we improve in some areas we arent going to go far in the playoffs.

but, alot of posters tend to oversensationalize when we lose...we are still 5-2, maybe 6-2 after next week...no team is without large flaws in the afc this year.

for as many yards as we are giving up, you would think that teams are scoring 30+ on us....but we are middle of the pack with 20or so points...and a large part of that is that we have a good redzone defense that limits our opponents to a turnover or 3pts.

can we ever fix this defense into a Ravents type D?? no....but you can take areas and try and turn them into a strength and that helps mask the weakness'

two areas we can improve on that will greatly help our secondary is

1. Pass rush- we have a good D-line, its starting to come through but just not consistently enough where we force the QB to make quick and bad decisions. if that can come together, our problems in the secondary will be greatly masked

2. 3rd down defense/tackling--these are issues that can be improved with coaching/more familiarity. you get a couple extra 3rd down stops, we have an opportunity to beat the steelers.


on Offense: anyone who calls this a "high school offense" obviously hasnt watched any Jets of Ravens games.

right now, we probably have one of the most dynamic offenses in ways we can attack you. we can air it out, or run it down your throats...dont forget we beat the Jets by a ground and pound approach.

what is killing us now is that we are missing a deep threat...teams have figured out to crowd the middle and play tight man, because most of our WR/TE cant get enough separation..

the one promising aspect to solve this though.....Taylor Price. he was WIDE OPEN deep and able to get separation on a good corner. if Brady doesnt underthrow, thats a TD...he did more with 7opportunities to show he should get more playing time than Ocho did with his even more opportunities....if he can play up to the potential we saw in the pre-season...we can solve that problem because we would have a speedy young WR who can beat man coverage

its never as good as it looks after a win, but its also never as bad as it looks after a loss...
 
for as many yards as we are giving up, you would think that teams are scoring 30+ on us....but we are middle of the pack with 20or so points...and a large part of that is that we have a good redzone defense that limits our opponents to a turnover or 3pts.

Those 25 points look worse when you consider they occurred in only 8 real possessions (final clock killing drive excluded), the norm is closer to 12. Also consider in that 8 is a 3 play INT drive, and a :30 end of the half drive.

So basically, the Pats gave up 25 points in 6 possessions, which is usually half a game. The 6th possession was a missed field goal.

So essentially, that's 5 scoring possessions - 2 touchdowns, 3 field goals, and 32 minutes of play consumed.

That's utterly embarrassing - and far, far worse than the point total indicates.

http://www.patsfans.com/new-england...er-possession-why-bend-dont-break-broken.html

It's all about PPP. Pats defense might've held the Steelers to field goals, but they did a great job of keeping their own offense off the field in the process.

It's part of the reason we blew 19-0.

It's gotta be fixed.
 
Last edited:
Just a note - I'm not the one calling it a high school offense, the OP is. Apparently I'm the only one out here who sees that as ridiculous.

Ok, so this is a non-answer on your part.


Semantics? I say the Pats need to tighten things up a bit, you and the OP want to change the scheme and replace all the 'stiffs' in the defensive backfield. If I'm an over-the-top homer, you and the OP are over-the-top critics. Fair enough?

1.) Jay's much closer to a homer than to a critic.

2.) I don't fall into the extreme on either side.

3.) Either you aren't watching the games, or you can't analyze worth a damn.
 
Recently, your tone has turned aggressively defensive and defiantly optimistic, and ultimately, credibility is starting to suffer. You seem too often to stifle actual constructive discussion - as Jays52 puts forth here - with dismissals.
Consider the content on this board that is there to respond to.


You are ignoring the results that this team has had recently in the games that matter, and against the highest competition in the league. There is a trend - in the types of games we lose - that dates back to February 2008 that is readily apparent, and we can't just brush that aside.
Quite the opposite, I am considering everything, not just isolated games that support a point I wish to make.

It doesn't matter how successful we are outside of those games - if we want to win the Super Bowl, we have to win one of those hard-fought, low-scoring matchups against a team that is tougher and more physical than us, and that can be physical with our receivers.
Ironically this comment comes after we lose once to a team we have dominated 2 weeks after defeating the team we lost to in the playoffs.


I'm sure Belichick isn't sitting there twiddling his thumbs resting on his laurels, assuming this team is A-OK. An informed poster, and fan of the team, like Jays52 shouldn't either.
Thats a bizarre little strawman.
So Jay is right about where he places blame because BB is working on improving the team?
So if I say we will never win another game, and you disagree, I can prove I'm right by saying I'm sure BB isn't content?
Are you suggesting that Jay posting will impact the play of the team? Just curious.
 
Consider the content on this board that is there to respond to.

Fair enough.



Quite the opposite, I am considering everything, not just isolated games that support a point I wish to make.

Unfortunately, in this sport - the last game of the season is the only one that matters. And this past Sunday's resembled the games that ended our season for the last half decade.


Ironically this comment comes after we lose once to a team we have dominated 2 weeks after defeating the team we lost to in the playoffs.
Right - making it even more disconcerting. We have dominated the Steelers - offensively, at least - but as soon as they changed their defensive game plan to one of re-routing our receivers and getting pressure without blitzing, we were slowed offensively. That said, I think our offensive struggles on Sunday are being oversold tremendously due to the lack of chances it had at possessions.

We're asking too much of that unit - and the problem lies on the other side of the ball. Defensively, I don't think I have to tell you what a mess we were on Sunday - and while Big Ben isn't elite, you can add him to the list of QBs we won't want to face with this secondary in January.

Thats a bizarre little strawman.
So Jay is right about where he places blame because BB is working on improving the team?
So if I say we will never win another game, and you disagree, I can prove I'm right by saying I'm sure BB isn't content?
Are you suggesting that Jay posting will impact the play of the team? Just curious.

No - naturally I'm not saying a messageboard can affect what happens on the field. I'm saying that Belichick is probably sitting in meeting rooms bitterly uttering some similar things as Jays52 said in his post - and that we'd be naive to think otherwise. Look I think both you and jays52 have vastly higher football IQs than me, and I'd think either would have the liberty of questioning what strengths and weaknesses this team have. The average poster might not have that leeway in my own eyes and I would be much more wary to receive negative commentary on the team from newbies or posters with less cache on the board. But I consider the source and the knowledge behind it. In this case, you are restraining yourself from applying your own knowledge constructively, instead choosing - IMO - almost blind optimism. That's just my take.

The time for that kind of optimism, has, unfortunately passed - until this team proves it can crush the Blueprint that is out there that gives it problems in big games and in the postseason.
 
Last edited:
No it's not, Michael Stipe.

That said, it is pretty bad and if there are not some serious changes made it's going to get ugly in hurry on both sides of the ball. Some are correctable, some are not, and some can be patched up enough to get you them home. I see these problems broken down into three major categories.

1) They have a high school offense and teams have figured it out. Think about it. Their best players are between the hashes and no one is going to back the safeties off. I've been concerned for a while about the lack out outside receivers and we're beginning to see this turn from a concern to a legitimate problem. The ambiguity and matchup problems of the two TE set are caused only when there is a legitimate outside presence. Why? Because without one the defense has no need to defend the deeper part of the field nor the areas outside the hashes with the safeties. The safeties are then allowed to drop down and provide not only a better TE matchup but robust run support . Further, the less of the demand placed on the exterior, the more it enables the defenses to beat the current bread and butter of Welker and Hernandez. Simply place an I/O bracket or get physical and pass to chase zones. Not only does this work to hurt the passing routes, but it keeps players in tight where they can better disguise pressures and defend the run. Without an outside option (they currently don't have one at either the x or z) the entire design of the offense won't work.

Solution: Pray that Price can play or Ocho wakes up one morning and says "oooooohhh. Wow, it's all so simple now."


Problem 2) Bill, let them play. So much of the talk lately has been about the GM practices. Alright, there's some valid points there and I'd sure like to have James Sanders back there to stabilize things, but ultimately all that stuff is irrelevant. There's nothing that can be done to change it, your roster is your roster, and goddamnit they are football players. This continued reliance upon this passive, weak, sickening two high safety look is poisoning the defense. I understand that it's risk mitigation and ultimately field goals aren't going to kill you, but it's removing one of your best defensive assets from contributing. The dual high safety crap is keeping Chung 20 yards from the action instead of letting him loose in the intermediate areas his skillset is so clearly geared towards. Ihedigbo? Sure, great, stick his ass 40 yards away from anything so he won't get in the way, but you have to start utilizing Chung. They also don't have linebackers getting sufficient depth and spread in their cover-2 and 4. Why do you think Heath Miller had such a huge game? He was getting behind the linebackers level. Once they began to move Guyton into that area it helped things (ie the INT) but it's been a glaring weakness all season.

Solution: The zones were spread and exposed by the Steelers in a perfect reversal of what normally happens in that game. Your players are in the NFL for a reason. You don't have Cooper Manning at corner. Bring your playmakers into positions that will enable them to make plays. Trust McCourty to right the ship. He will. Let your long-armed, strong corners leverage their skill sets. Don't ask a linebacker who runs a 5.2 40 to be your Mike in a Tampa-2 where he has to get safety depth. Stop confusing first time starters by trying to execute cute morphing coverages that replace exchange zones. You cut Sanders and are now confusing everyone else. They're football players. Let them play football. Execute good, sound fundamental coverages and at least let your players just fly around. You've got a fast team. UTILIZE IT. Mix in some blitzing and if you get burnt on occasion you get burnt. At least your players will be able to play. Otherwise you'll continue to play prevent right until you're kicked out in the first round for the third consecutive year. I love the x's and o's but sometimes the smartest move is to simplify.

Problem 3) They're soft. Mankins, Gronk, Spikes, and Welker are the only guys that standout as badasses. Seven years ago that whole damn team was 22 badasses. They're unemotional and most importantly playing not to get beat. This team has paralysis by analysis and that's very scary.

Solution: Type how soft they are on messageboards in hopes it gives the coaching staff sufficient motivational collateral. Again, dedicate yourself to an aggressive scheme and let your players play fast and emotional. This team has been over-intellectualized and it shows.

I respect your football acumen, but you really mailed this one in.

Wrong, again.

Brother Jay would produce far greater work ~ far more insightfull, intriguing, eye-opening, and educational ~ on his very worst day ~ hungover, dirty, with rap music blaring in the background and one hand tied behind his back while getting smacked over the head with a rolled up newspaper ~ than you ever could...on your best.

You may go now.
 
Good stuff, Jay. #1 and #3 are pretty much spot on. I'd argue that the problem with #2 is that they aren't good enough and experienced enough to let loose, and that the Patriots aren't actually a fast team, particularly in the front seven, but I can see what you're saying as well.



Always great to see you throwing out the thoughts and ideas. You should do it a lot more often.

Couldn't agree more.
 
#1 reminds me of the 2004 AFC Div playoff game gameplan of the pats vs colts. Colts later said that the pats basically took the middle of the field out of the colts offense and forced them to throw outside.
 
No, it's not just 1 game. They needed an excellent late 4th quarter drive to come back to win the game at home against the Cowboys. It would seem the Cowboys also did favors for the Patriot defense in their play selection that the Steelers absolutely did not.

You can say "it's midseason, just wait" all you want, but there is a lot of truth to what many posters here (the critical ones) are saying. The Patriots have won a lot of regular season games and maybe even looked like SB contenders - yet we've seen two straight 1 and done losses in the playoffs at home. Is this type of thing going to happen again? That's really the heart of the angst here. We all want playoff wins, but are tempering our expectations because the team is showing signs (based on things we've seen in years past) that they may not be a strong contender. Further, most consider that a crying shame since we've got a once in a franchise history QB.

Your post obviously makes a lot of sense, and I question many of the moves myself, but I really don't think that having a couple of losses to very good competition in the likes of '09 Baltimore or '10 New York is really that much to freak out over. Those were some seriously well matched teams; especially considering that we'd just lost Welker in the Ravens game, and the NYJ game could've really gone either way. Let's look at it another way, and give credit to some good competition.

BALTIMORE--(no Welker) This had disaster written all over it, especially considering that yr's team was very young and inexperienced. They had problems on the road the majority of the yr, and the Ravens were playing pretty well. They devised a good game plan, and deserved to win. I truly don't see it as the Pats blew much of anything.

NYJETS--I think last yr's team 'blew it' to some extent, sure. I also think that the Jets and Rex Ryan deserve some credit. Actually, a lot of credit. They devised a GREAT scheme, and have 2 very talented CB's (the strength of their team). Chung's failed punt-fake was pretty much the momentum changer going into the half, but the green/inexperienced defense once again let us down in the 2nd half. But you'd have to give a lot of credit to Ryan and the Jets, it isn't like they lost to the KC Chiefs at home, it was against a very tough division rival.

As far as your "great QB" argument goes, there honestly have been a lot of great QB's (and I don't want to get into ranking them, b/c you really can't do that) who have "ONLY" won a SB or two. Hell, Marino never won any. Jim Kelly was pretty good in his heydey, he came up a loser. As did many others. I get what you're saying about the infamous "window closing" for Brady, but that may also mean he plays another 5-6 yrs too, thus giving him a chance at FIVE SB appearances, and FOUR SB wins. C'mon man, you've gotta admit that isn't too bad..even for someone as talanted as Brady. That would easily put him in the upper-echelon of SB winning QB's, which is of course where he deserves to be.

Like I said, I do agree with you to some degree, and I do respect your viewpoint--but I am giving you something to think about too.
 
its getting abit annoying that anyone who doesnt succumb to the "sky is falling" thought process is a "homer"

realistically, we have alot of problems on defense...and unless we improve in some areas we arent going to go far in the playoffs.

but, alot of posters tend to oversensationalize when we lose...we are still 5-2, maybe 6-2 after next week...no team is without large flaws in the afc this year.

for as many yards as we are giving up, you would think that teams are scoring 30+ on us....but we are middle of the pack with 20or so points...and a large part of that is that we have a good redzone defense that limits our opponents to a turnover or 3pts.

can we ever fix this defense into a Ravents type D?? no....but you can take areas and try and turn them into a strength and that helps mask the weakness'

two areas we can improve on that will greatly help our secondary is

1. Pass rush- we have a good D-line, its starting to come through but just not consistently enough where we force the QB to make quick and bad decisions. if that can come together, our problems in the secondary will be greatly masked

2. 3rd down defense/tackling--these are issues that can be improved with coaching/more familiarity. you get a couple extra 3rd down stops, we have an opportunity to beat the steelers.


on Offense: anyone who calls this a "high school offense" obviously hasnt watched any Jets of Ravens games.

right now, we probably have one of the most dynamic offenses in ways we can attack you. we can air it out, or run it down your throats...dont forget we beat the Jets by a ground and pound approach.

what is killing us now is that we are missing a deep threat...teams have figured out to crowd the middle and play tight man, because most of our WR/TE cant get enough separation..

the one promising aspect to solve this though.....Taylor Price. he was WIDE OPEN deep and able to get separation on a good corner. if Brady doesnt underthrow, thats a TD...he did more with 7opportunities to show he should get more playing time than Ocho did with his even more opportunities....if he can play up to the potential we saw in the pre-season...we can solve that problem because we would have a speedy young WR who can beat man coverage

its never as good as it looks after a win, but its also never as bad as it looks after a loss...

I have more of a problem with the 20 points in 40 minutes TOP than I have in 20 points given up in of itself. if the defense can't force any punts, then the offense is going to end up getting the ball a) infrequently, and b) with a long field in front of them. It's extremely difficult for any defense, even the best in the league, to put up >20 points under those conditions.
 
Thats a bizarre little strawman.
...
Are you suggesting that Jay posting will impact the play of the team? Just curious.

.... no, nobody is suggesting that.
 
Fair enough.





Unfortunately, in this sport - the last game of the season is the only one that matters. And this past Sunday's resembled the games that ended our season for the last half decade.



Right - making it even more disconcerting. We have dominated the Steelers - offensively, at least - but as soon as they changed their defensive game plan to one of re-routing our receivers and getting pressure without blitzing, we were slowed offensively. That said, I think our offensive struggles on Sunday are being oversold tremendously due to the lack of chances it had at possessions.

We're asking too much of that unit - and the problem lies on the other side of the ball. Defensively, I don't think I have to tell you what a mess we were on Sunday - and while Big Ben isn't elite, you can add him to the list of QBs we won't want to face with this secondary in January.



No - naturally I'm not saying a messageboard can affect what happens on the field. I'm saying that Belichick is probably sitting in meeting rooms bitterly uttering some similar things as Jays52 said in his post - and that we'd be naive to think otherwise. Look I think both you and jays52 have vastly higher football IQs than me, and I'd think either would have the liberty of questioning what strengths and weaknesses this team have. The average poster might not have that leeway in my own eyes and I would be much more wary to receive negative commentary on the team from newbies or posters with less cache on the board. But I consider the source and the knowledge behind it. In this case, you are restraining yourself from applying your own knowledge constructively, instead choosing - IMO - almost blind optimism. That's just my take.

The time for that kind of optimism, has, unfortunately passed - until this team proves it can crush the Blueprint that is out there that gives it problems in big games and in the postseason.
The point is there isnt a blueprint
 
Wrong, again.

Brother Jay would produce far greater work ~ far more insightfull, intriguing, eye-opening, and educational ~ on his very worst day ~ hungover, dirty, with rap music blaring in the background and one hand tied behind his back while getting smacked over the head with a rolled up newspaper ~ than you ever could...on your best.

You may go now.
Thank you for the moron view.
 
Jay...you said to "trust Mccourty, he will right the ship. He will" What have u seen from McCourty this year that makes you believe that? I hope you are right....I loved watching the guy last year. But, i'm starting to think that he benefitted ALOT from the play of Merriweather and Sanders and they covered up some of his weaknesses. Now he IS the guy....without much help. Chung is good but seems to be a little slow at times (maybe still after effects from injury?) But other than chung u have a bunch of jags playing with him. Curious as to your thoughts here....thanks

No it's not, Michael Stipe.



That said, it is pretty bad and if there are not some serious changes made it's going to get ugly in hurry on both sides of the ball. Some are correctable, some are not, and some can be patched up enough to get you them home. I see these problems broken down into three major categories.

1) They have a high school offense and teams have figured it out. Think about it. Their best players are between the hashes and no one is going to back the safeties off. I've been concerned for a while about the lack out outside receivers and we're beginning to see this turn from a concern to a legitimate problem. The ambiguity and matchup problems of the two TE set are caused only when there is a legitimate outside presence. Why? Because without one the defense has no need to defend the deeper part of the field nor the areas outside the hashes with the safeties. The safeties are then allowed to drop down and provide not only a better TE matchup but robust run support . Further, the less of the demand placed on the exterior, the more it enables the defenses to beat the current bread and butter of Welker and Hernandez. Simply place an I/O bracket or get physical and pass to chase zones. Not only does this work to hurt the passing routes, but it keeps players in tight where they can better disguise pressures and defend the run. Without an outside option (they currently don't have one at either the x or z) the entire design of the offense won't work.

Solution: Pray that Price can play or Ocho wakes up one morning and says "oooooohhh. Wow, it's all so simple now."


Problem 2) Bill, let them play. So much of the talk lately has been about the GM practices. Alright, there's some valid points there and I'd sure like to have James Sanders back there to stabilize things, but ultimately all that stuff is irrelevant. There's nothing that can be done to change it, your roster is your roster, and goddamnit they are football players. This continued reliance upon this passive, weak, sickening two high safety look is poisoning the defense. I understand that it's risk mitigation and ultimately field goals aren't going to kill you, but it's removing one of your best defensive assets from contributing. The dual high safety crap is keeping Chung 20 yards from the action instead of letting him loose in the intermediate areas his skillset is so clearly geared towards. Ihedigbo? Sure, great, stick his ass 40 yards away from anything so he won't get in the way, but you have to start utilizing Chung. They also don't have linebackers getting sufficient depth and spread in their cover-2 and 4. Why do you think Heath Miller had such a huge game? He was getting behind the linebackers level. Once they began to move Guyton into that area it helped things (ie the INT) but it's been a glaring weakness all season.

Solution: The zones were spread and exposed by the Steelers in a perfect reversal of what normally happens in that game. Your players are in the NFL for a reason. You don't have Cooper Manning at corner. Bring your playmakers into positions that will enable them to make plays. Trust McCourty to right the ship. He will. Let your long-armed, strong corners leverage their skill sets. Don't ask a linebacker who runs a 5.2 40 to be your Mike in a Tampa-2 where he has to get safety depth. Stop confusing first time starters by trying to execute cute morphing coverages that replace exchange zones. You cut Sanders and are now confusing everyone else. They're football players. Let them play football. Execute good, sound fundamental coverages and at least let your players just fly around. You've got a fast team. UTILIZE IT. Mix in some blitzing and if you get burnt on occasion you get burnt. At least your players will be able to play. Otherwise you'll continue to play prevent right until you're kicked out in the first round for the third consecutive year. I love the x's and o's but sometimes the smartest move is to simplify.

Problem 3) They're soft. Mankins, Gronk, Spikes, and Welker are the only guys that standout as badasses. Seven years ago that whole damn team was 22 badasses. They're unemotional and most importantly playing not to get beat. This team has paralysis by analysis and that's very scary.

Solution: Type how soft they are on messageboards in hopes it gives the coaching staff sufficient motivational collateral. Again, dedicate yourself to an aggressive scheme and let your players play fast and emotional. This team has been over-intellectualized and it shows.
 
The point is there isnt a blueprint

We'll agree to disagree on that one for the moment. By the end of the year, you might be right.

But right now - I think there is a formula for teams to defeat this time IF they have the personnel to pull it off. There are between 3-5 teams with that personnel, unfortunately, they are also the league's elite and stand between us and another Super Bowl.

A plethora of things can happen between now and January to break that. Some things as simple as Devin McCourty returning to form; Haynesworth breaking out; Cunningham evolving and contributing; Taylor Price emerging...any one of these things would add a new dimension that helps redefine our team.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
TRANSCRIPT: Eliot Wolf Pre-Draft Press Conference 4/13
Patriots News 04-12, What To Watch For In The NFL Draft
MORSE: Pre-Draft Patriots News and Notes
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft 5
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft 5
Mark Morse
1 week ago
Patriots Part Ways with Another Linebacker as Offseason Roster Shake-Up Continues
Patriots News 04-05, Mock Draft 2.0, Patriots Look For OL Depth
MORSE: 18 Game Schedule and Other Patriots Notes
TRANSCRIPT: Mike Vrabel Press Conference at the League Meetings 3/31
MORSE: Smokescreens and Misinformation Leading Up to Patriots Draft
Patriots News 03-29, Mock Draft 1.0, Tight End Draft Profiles
Back
Top