MrBigglesWorth
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2006
- Messages
- 9,922
- Reaction score
- 1,623
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.What? No. We're gonna speculate on whether Wilfork's mysterious ankle injury is his death knell and if Wright or Hill can replace him. Look for that thread on Thursday.Let's get this thread up to 100 replies.
Next we're going to speculate on MArquise Hill, whether to keep him or get rid of him and how the heck did he hurt his knee when he hasn't played?
If we had a deep threat Watson would likely see a lot of single coverage and defenders would be forced to give him more space. As it stands defenses are stupid not to double cover him every play and have a defender draped all over him, with another playing "safety".
This limits Watsons catches, helps facilitate drops, and limits yards after the catch. I'm amazed he's done what he has this season given everything working against him.
My man, I watch EVERY Pats game just like we all do!
Sometimes on TiVO, sometimes live. And usually break down film one or twice during the week. (I know, I need some hobbies - my wife tells me the same thing! "You're watching the Pats game AGAIN?!?!?!?)
Watson took a hit to the knee, yes. And over the course of any football game, about 20-25 players take hits to the knee.
That says nothing. Have all those other players missed three weeks?
And Watson's knee injury is only a small part of his train ticket out of Foxboro. The bigger issue is his fumbilitis and his general lack of unfulfilled potential.
In the end, it's all spec anyway.
We're just fans, one's opinion no better than the next. I respect your opionion even if I don't disagree.
For me, I tend to be one who is very hard on guys who miss weeks behind ticky-tacky injuries. Call it my burden, if you will!
ADPF
Why would you call another poster who gives his opinion "dumber?"
He is entitled to his opinions, and views, so why call him dumb?
If you disagree, why don't you just say so, but to call him dumb is making it personal.
You used the "quote" feature to show a poster's quote, and responded to IT, not to the entire thread, by saying it couldn't get DUMBER. To anyone reading it, as you posted it, it appears as if yu are calling THAT poster to be dumb. And, I believe that you are. Unfortunately, it is a bad habit that you have picked up from a couple of other posters, because in the past, you were never like that.
I am merely pointing it out to you in an attempt to help out a fellow Pats fan, like yourself, not to be like some of the others who are helping to destroy this forum.
And, BTW, by me saying that Watson is not going anywhere, It implies NOTHING more than my opinion that he will stay with the Patriots. If you read more in to it, then thats your problem, not mine.
You used the "quote" feature to show a poster's quote, and responded to IT, not to the entire thread, by saying it couldn't get DUMBER. To anyone reading it, as you posted it, it appears as if yu are calling THAT poster to be dumb. And, I believe that you are. Unfortunately, it is a bad habit that you have picked up from a couple of other posters, because in the past, you were never like that.
I am merely pointing it out to you in an attempt to help out a fellow Pats fan, like yourself, not to be like some of the others who are helping to destroy this forum.
And, BTW, by me saying that Watson is not going anywhere, It implies NOTHING more than my opinion that he will stay with the Patriots. If you read more in to it, then thats your problem, not mine.
Hard to believe this thread could get dumber.
Now we're diagnosing knee injuries by mental telepathy?
No, NEM, you're not telling the truth here. What RayClay said was that it's hard to believe the THREAD could get dumber:
That's clearly not calling the poster dumb, although it calls the post itself into question. I am merely pointing it out to you in an attempt to help out a fellow Pats fan, like yourself, not to be continuing to state the sort of untrue remarks that are helping to destroy this forum. Unfortunately, this is a bad habit that you've picked up from yourself.
I'm just trying to help. If you read more into it, then that's your problem, not mine.
I seen several remarks stating Thomas has had one good game - I beg to differ, he has had quite a number of good games, he just has been used more as a blocker/STer than a primary receiver. Which goes to show he started slow and steadily improved his play to take advantage of his opportunities. Chad Jackson is now getting some nice blocking opportunities, but I digress...
"Just when you thought Old Watson was about to become a star, along comes Watson's own personal "Ben Coates" in the form of Dave Thomas and before you know it, the promise becomes a memory and he's playing for some cut-rate franchise somewhere!"
WHOA, are you really comparing Dave Thomas to Ben Coates !!
Ben Coates, 5 time pro bowler, 500 receptions, 5500 yards, 50 TDS . Talk about dissin Big Ben !!
My man, I watch EVERY Pats game just like we all do!
Sometimes on TiVO, sometimes live. And usually break down film one or twice during the week. (I know, I need some hobbies - my wife tells me the same thing! "You're watching the Pats game AGAIN?!?!?!?)
Watson took a hit to the knee, yes. And over the course of any football game, about 20-25 players take hits to the knee.
That says nothing. Have all those other players missed three weeks?
And Watson's knee injury is only a small part of his train ticket out of Foxboro. The bigger issue is his fumbilitis and his general lack of unfulfilled potential.
In the end, it's all spec anyway.
We're just fans, one's opinion no better than the next. I respect your opionion even if I don't disagree.
For me, I tend to be one who is very hard on guys who miss weeks behind ticky-tacky injuries. Call it my burden, if you will!
ADPF