- Joined
- Mar 19, 2006
- Messages
- 33,984
- Reaction score
- 14,474
It’s true that a contract cannot overrule a league rule, but the Patriots situation is more complex. The question is whether or not Caserio is right now considered a “high-level employee” or “non high-level employee.” The contract may contain a clause by which Caserio acknowledges he is in fact a “high-level employee” which may be further supported by his responsibilities and compensation being commensurate to other GMs and top-level personnel leaders.
Another way of looking at it is, what if a GM was in a situation where he didn’t have complete autonomy and needed the owner/coach to agree on personnel decisions. Would he be able to get a “promotion” by going to another organization where he has full autonomy? The argument gets pretty gray. Caserio is the highest ranking personnel guy on the Patriots by title and is likely paid like it, too.
New England Patriots
And that is why Florio’s reasoning is specious. It’s a very slippery slope to overlook title and compensation, perhaps defined in the language of the contract, and make judgment calls on which position is “higher level” when both quality as “high-level.” Many organizations have GMs who don’t have full autonomy, but they are protected.
Does the Caserio clause comply with league rules?
The emphasis wasn’t added by me; it appears in the policy. And the argument would be, if push comes to shove, that this provision of the tampering policy supersedes the Caserio clause, which as applied would prevent him from leaving his non-high-level employee job with the Patriots (coach Bill Belichick obviously runs the show in New England) for an opportunity to become a “high-level employee” with another team.
Just tell me how many draft picks