- Joined
- Feb 19, 2007
- Messages
- 17,406
- Reaction score
- 16,899
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Rumors at the NFL combine say we are looking to trade for Clowney for the 31st pick.
As well as Brandin Cooks away to the Bears for a second rounder.
It was reputable chatter around the combine.How gullible are you? Neither of those things are actual reports. It was some espn stooge mediot making hypothetical trades
But does Talib or Sherman change that?
What I mean is, they went into the game intentionally using big nickel, with Chung in the slot and DMac playing SS, and using Gilmore and Rowe on the outside. And the went big (huge?) dime on 3rd down with Richards. With Sherman or Talib, does that change things? They take Rowe's spot, but given then were looking to go heavier, I'm not sure Rowe is out there in the slot or as the 6th DB. Maybe they would have put Rowe in the slot as their 2nd half adjustment instead of Bademosi, but that's not exactly his strength. I think the real problem was with the game plan, which was probably partially caused by the lack faith in our LBs and DL to be able to stop the run without extra safety support.
One of them will eventually come here. I don't like the though of Rowe being the second corner. He was toasted in the super bowl.
You are trying to reason with people that still think the secondary was the issue in the SB. If by now they have not taken the effort to read through various analysis or rewatch the game to see that in reality the front 7 was the main problem then there is no hope for them.
It was reputable chatter around the combine.
If it was fabricated shame on them.
Calling me gullible is a jerk move unless you have intimate knowledge from Caserio or Belichick himself.
If you do I bow to your all knowing prowess.
If you don't then please don't call me gullible reporting trade rumors.
Rumors at the NFL combine say we are looking to trade for Clowney for the 31st pick.
As well as Brandin Cooks away to the Bears for a second rounder.
I'd only be ok trading Cooks if Robinson or Watkins or Martavius Bryant is walking thru that door.
What you're failing to take into account is, you so badly think its our front 7 that we should fix and spend on, but fail to mention a legit plan to do so. Please name a few former pro bowl/all pro defensive linemen who are available for trade, and are on somewhat reasonable contracts. There just aren't many. bennett was about the only one and clearly that didn't work. Anyone else who would make a splash would cost at least another 5 million a season. The draft is our best bet on for the front 7.
All Bill has shown us time and time again we have no idea what he will or won't do improve this team.You are not only gullible as genius posts like those show:
but also terrible at assessing players. Cooks over Watkins, Bryant and Robinson (coming of an ACL) every day. Especially Watkins and Bryant are laughable. Both moody divas that have done nothing in this league with the latter being one misstep away from a long suspension.
The fact that you would actually torpedo our salary cap structure and throw away #31 for a year of Clowney at 13.8m just shows that you are playing fantasy football in your mind. Because he is exactly the kind of player -- like Chandler Jones -- that we would not give a second contract but let hit FA.
Finally you are the clown for taking IncarcaretedBob level rumors serious and defending them and not the people calling you out.
I still don't think we've seen the Best Cooks and Brady can give us. I really want to see them together for a year two. I get that people think that money can be used well elsewhere but Brady and Cooks need more time together.
All Bill has shown us time and time again we have no idea what he will or won't do improve this team.
I could once again show each time BB has surprised us and once again broke the mold for what his philosophy cap structure and ways to obtain a player have changed year in and year out.
Let's just enjoy the ride that will be the Patriots coming off a Superbowl loss where Bill could even stay the course and replace a few holes.
I believe he goes almost nuclear on defense.
But does Talib or Sherman change that?
What I mean is, they went into the game intentionally using big nickel, with Chung in the slot and DMac playing SS, and using Gilmore and Rowe on the outside. And the went big (huge?) dime on 3rd down with Richards. With Sherman or Talib, does that change things? They take Rowe's spot, but given then were looking to go heavier, I'm not sure Rowe is out there in the slot or as the 6th DB. Maybe they would have put Rowe in the slot as their 2nd half adjustment instead of Bademosi, but that's not exactly his strength. I think the real problem was with the game plan, which was probably partially caused by the lack faith in our LBs and DL to be able to stop the run without extra safety support.
He was not.
Really? Did you watch the super bowl? They immediately went after him.
Really? Did you watch the super bowl? They immediately went after him.