REISS: How will the Patriots respond in 2026 to the Super Bowl loss?

[Ian]

Terrific long-form article from yesterday if you haven't seen it:

How will the Patriots respond in 2026 to the Super Bowl loss?​

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/49648149/new-england-patriots-how-respond-super-bowl-loss-2026-season

 

[patfanken]

The fact is the next season for the Superbowl loser has not been kind. It's not only that you now have a target on your back either. It's the playing more than another full month of football. It's the fact you suffered the wear and tear of a TWENTY-ONE game season. You drafted at the bottom of every round. AND you have to live with fact that even though you got to the Superbowl, you ended up just like every other of the 30 other teams who have nothing to show for season, but a nice effort.

Maybe this large roster turnover is a good thing in the end. They have clearly improved areas of weakness in the OL, secondary, and depth. This IS a more talented team that last year, with a lot of that great rookie class showing a 2nd year bump. The current draft class seems to be holding their own, especially the top 4 picks, BUT so has every other team in the league.

Bottom line, the majority of every game in an NFL season is going to be a one score contest. Games like that can often turn on a play or two. We used to say that there will be 5 plays in any game that will determine the outcome, you just never know when these plays will happen. It could be a tipped ball that just happens to fall into a defender's hands, while the next one just hits the turf. A fumble that bounces TO a defender, or to the offense. A referee's call or non-call. And many more of those things that we all put down to LUCK in the game that help determine the winner of a close game.

We had a lot of good bounces last season and there is NO guarantee that this season will see a repeat. Just like there is no guarantee that it won't. The NFL is just THAT competitive. All I DO know is that the team did a decent job improving this team and setting up for another playoff run. Now we just have to see how it plays out.

 

[neuronet]

From the article:

Are the Patriots primed to succumb to a tougher schedule or will Vrabel's relentless commitment to establishing team identity deliver another surprising run to the Super Bowl?

Is this really the choice? Generally a decent article, but I don't love these kinds of false choices.

 

[rkarp1]

The fact is the next season for the Superbowl loser has not been kind. It's not only that you now have a target on your back either. It's the playing more than another full month of football. It's the fact you suffered the wear and tear of a TWENTY-ONE game season. You drafted at the bottom of every round. AND you have to live with fact that even though you got to the Superbowl, you ended up just like every other of the 30 other teams who have nothing to show for season, but a nice effort.

Maybe this large roster turnover is a good thing in the end. They have clearly improved areas of weakness in the OL, secondary, and depth. This IS a more talented team that last year, with a lot of that great rookie class showing a 2nd year bump. The current draft class seems to be holding their own, especially the top 4 picks, BUT so has every other team in the league.

Bottom line, the majority of every game in an NFL season is going to be a one score contest. Games like that can often turn on a play or two. We used to say that there will be 5 plays in any game that will determine the outcome, you just never know when these plays will happen. It could be a tipped ball that just happens to fall into a defender's hands, while the next one just hits the turf. A fumble that bounces TO a defender, or to the offense. A referee's call or non-call. And many more of those things that we all put down to LUCK in the game that help determine the winner of a close game.

We had a lot of good bounces last season and there is NO guarantee that this season will see a repeat. Just like there is no guarantee that it won't. The NFL is just THAT competitive. All I DO know is that the team did a decent job improving this team and setting up for another playoff run. Now we just have to see how it plays out.

good post
I agree, the roster refresh/turnover is a good thing.
also, Maye and Campbell need to remove the stain of arguably their worst game of the season.
I expect a great game, in a very difficult environment. I also question if Darnold can replicate last season.
regardless, win or lose, this is a great barometer for what the team is very early on
perhaps a silver lining, they will have a very long week to heal/prep for game 2

 

[TheRainMaker]

Injuries held back the 1997 team as they would've taken the #2 seed from the Steelers and most likely have beaten them again at home in the divisional round.

The 2008 team bounced back to that devastating loss and should've made the playoffs at 11-5.

The 2012 team went back to the AFCCG and would've been back in the Super Bowl if it weren't for the mismanagement of Gronk and Talib's injury.

Pats won in 2018.

Barring major injuries, they should be fine in 2026.

 

[RobertWeathers]

Injuries held back the 1997 team as they would've taken the #2 seed from the Steelers and most likely have beaten them again at home in the divisional round.

Yep. No CMart. No Meggett and Coates played with a broken thumb vs Pitt

The 2008 team bounced back to that devastating loss and should've made the playoffs at 11-5.

Agree but their schedule was weak and were always beaten by better teams.

The 2012 team went back to the AFCCG and would've been back in the Super Bowl if it weren't for the mismanagement of Gronk and Talib's injury.

..and WW drop on 3rd and 7 in the 3rd qtr.

Pats won in 2018.

Was iffy for a while but turned it on just in time.

Barring major injuries, they should be fine in 2026.

Yep. Record won't be as good but IMO they are a better, more talented team.

 

[sb1]

Then again they were champs in 2016 coming off the greatest comeback of all time and got thumped by Alex Smith's Chiefs in the opener.

Funny that Alex Smith has beaten the Patriots comfortably twice but Kermit Mahomes has never done so even against way worse Patriot teams. I guess logically that means Alex Smith > Kermit Mahomes. Can't argue with that.

 

[TheRainMaker]

Yep. No CMart. No Meggett and Coates played with a broken thumb vs Pitt

Terry Glenn missed time as well. They all just couldn't be on the field at the same time. KC looked like the the AFC favorite. Those divisional games Den at KC and NE at Pittsburgh were some of the weirdest playoff games I've seen.

Agree but their schedule was weak and were always beaten by better teams.

It wasn't that bad. They went 4-5 against teams .500 and above. Had few blowouts against Miami, SD and Pittsburgh though. Close loses to Indy and NYJ. 6 AFC teams had at least 11 wins which is insane.

..and WW drop on 3rd and 7 in the 3rd qtr.

I had enough of WW after that. They didn't lose the game because of that, but those mistakes just can't happen.

Yep. Record won't be as good but IMO they are a better, more talented team.

14-3 is really tough to duplicate. I see 5 losses at most. They are going to be a top 2 team in the AFC.