Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I think you're right that Dowling won't be asked to defend against slot receivers, even if he does stay at CB. Bodden has been playing that role though, so it's possible that in 3WR sets Dowling could be line up outside as a CB. And if it's not him, it will likely be Arrington, with Bodden still being on the inside. Either way, I wouldn't get too hung up on who is getting paid how much and the idea that a nickel corner is worth less than an outside corner. Against a lot of offenses, your #3 CB is on the field as much as most of your other starters- I remember AJ Smith explaining that in their eyes the #3 CB was a starter, and that was why they drafted Cason in the first round when they already had Cromartie and Jammer.
It's also possible that he could be predominantly a safety who occasionally lines up as a CB, which is something that Meriweather has done before I believe.
Just seems unBelichick-like to pay a #3 corner as much as Bodden, but maybe it's the way the league is evolving, I don't know.
But assume Dowling is a non factor this year... Why would Bodden kick to nickel and Arrington play outside? It would seem more fitting to keep Bodden outside and stick the smaller Arrington at nickel, no?
While this is entirely possible, i think he'll play wherever he is best suited. I don't think Dowling is quick enough to be that nickel corner, correct me if I'm wrong. Doesn't seem fluid enough in the hips. McCourty will obviously be at the top of the depth chart, and I don't see us paying Bodden to ONLY be a nickel corner and put Dowling opposite McCourty. I don't know though.
What I'm trying to say is would it make sense to have McCourty and Bodden on the field in the base defense, and then slide Bodden over to nickel and insert Dowling across from McCourty? I don't think we'd pay Bodden to be strictly a nickel back, hence Dowling having more value at safety, IF he's a good player there of course.
Arrington isn't especially quick, so I'm not sure that he's an ideal nickel CB. I'm no expert on this, by any means, but I guess I'm mostly saying that I wouldn't assume that the inside CB is the #3 CB. The one who's lining up inside is the one who is best-equipped to handle the slot receiver, and there's no inherent reason why he couldn't be your best CB. After all, Revis defends Welker when the Jets play us, and that definitely doesn't make him their #3 CB.
You might be right. If it were me, and Dowling was to be a CB, I'd line him up wherever the biggest WR is lined up and play him in a man or a zone depending on what the call was.
If Dowling is going to be a S sooner rather then later, then that means Merri is probably gone via trade, and Wilhite is our 4th (erghhhh...).
Just seems unBelichick-like to pay a #3 corner as much as Bodden, but maybe it's the way the league is evolving, I don't know.
But assume Dowling is a non factor this year... Why would Bodden kick to nickel and Arrington play outside? It would seem more fitting to keep Bodden outside and stick the smaller Arrington at nickel, no?
Why would outside be more important?I'm not sure this is correct, though, if that means you are downgrading the other outside cornerback position. What I mean is Bodden is probably better than Arrington on the outside and at the nickel back, so wouldn't you want him outside?
You're assuming that Bodden moving inside would be because of some deficiency of Bodden. It's more likely that it would be due to the limitations of Arrington/Butle/Dowling.
Why would outside be more important?
We are talking about playing Bodden outside in the base and when we go to nickle playing him inside. Why would it make him less valuable? Slot guys are targetted the most on 3rd down.
That's long been the perception, but I don't think it's the reality any more. If you look at the past couple of pro bowl rosters, 9 of the 11 safeties selected were drafted in the first 2 rounds, compared to 7 of the 11 corners.
Or to put it another way, I'd say that the most valuable DB of the past decade has been Ed Reed, not any CB. If Dowling could improve the team most by playing safety, I wouldn't hesitate.
That makes sense thanks.It's applied physics. The rec knows where he is going, the DB does not, so the DB has to be able to change directions very quickly, someone who is taller and/or heavier simply cannot react as quickly.
WHY in the world would anyone compare RAS-I to Cromartie?
RAS-I is an amazing tackler and run stopper at the CB spot. One of the best Ive seen in College.
Cromartie is terrible at run support and wrap up tackling.
that and their intelligence are the only things that set them apart.
I dont care. Perhaps YOU should watch more tape.
Dowling is a solid run defender who is not afraid to stick his nose in a scrum.
Cromartie is a terrible run defender who shys away from contact.
Enough said!
Its not about being a GM, i am just tired of seeing this secondary give up big plays and not stop 3rd downs!!
I'm not sure this is correct, though, if that means you are downgrading the other outside cornerback position. What I mean is Bodden is probably better than Arrington on the outside and at the nickel back, so wouldn't you want him outside?
Well.. perhaps, but that's not what I said.
Draft 1st round counts for CB and S:
Year CB S
2004 4 - 1
2005 5 - 0
2006 4 - 3
2007 3 - 4
2008 5 - 1
2009 2 - 0
2010 5 - 2
28 CB's to 11 S's in the 1st round of the last 7 drafts.
It's a bit like baseball - SS become 3B as they age, CF's move to LF with age. S is IMO physically easier to play then CB, thus there is a smaller pool of elite or even elite-> servicable CB's vs. S's.
One of my favorite draft moments. Kiper just threw his hands up in the air and said "... what can I say? It's Bill Belichick."
| 21 | 4K |
| 30 | 3K |
| 502 | 36K |
| 68 | 6K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 5 - April 20 (Through 26yrs)











