Post Game Thread Pats @ Jets

[Ring 6]

... with no replays on either. How do we keep getting these penalties called on running plays?

Yeah no replays was odd.

 

[Ring 6]

Horrific? Dude gtfo of my face. I called that **** from the first replay I saw

Don't waste your breath. It was horrific to him because being a bad call gives his patriot suck mantra more life. He is a troll and not a patriot fan.

 

[luuked]

That was a horrific call...come on man. Atlanta isn't invincible but they are going to just go off on O. Brady will need to be superman...then some.

He doesnt need to be superman but maybe just stop throwing into double or triple coverage.

 

[maineman209]

I called the reversed Jets TD on the first replay before the review. The runner lost control of the ball before crossing the plane and didn't regain control until he was already out of bounds.

The officials' review replay simply verified the call.

The only "controversy" is whether Eagle and Fouts were being disingenuous or are really that stupid.

 

[TBR]

There's some atrocious tendencies on this defense that still haven't been fixed.

I get it, "a win is a win" - nobody argues otherwise. But man, there's no need to sugar-coat and constantly excuse the concerning play of the defense. Their play doesn't project well going forward against playoff caliber teams.

 

[Delicate Genius]

There's some atrocious tendencies on this defense that still haven't been fixed.

I get it, "a win is a win" - nobody argues otherwise. But man, there's no need to sugar-coat and constantly excuse the concerning play of the defense. It doesn't project well going forward.

Excellent avatar.

 

[Bartmac36]

Why?

AT WORST, thats an incomplete pass call. The fact that the pats got possession of the ball is just an utter embarrassment. Having said that, its an officiating issue, not a patriots issue

 

[A Defiant Goose]

I called the reversed Jets TD on the first replay before the review. The runner lost control of the ball before crossing the plane and didn't regain control until he was already out of bounds.

The officials' review replay simply verified the call.

The only "controversy" is whether Eagle and Fouts were being disingenuous or are really that stupid.

Exactly. It was obvious what the call should be from the very first replay. Although I was surprised they actually had the balls to make the right call

 

[SlowGettingUp]

Lol. Im a pats fan but that was one of the most horrific calls ive ever seen

The ball is clearly hanging in mid-air, possessed by nobody, as it breaks the plane.

Football Zebras:
Patriots at Jets (video). Jets tight end Austin Seferian-Jenkins scored what appeared to be a clear touchdown. On review, not only was the touchdown reversed, the ball went to the Patriots on a touchback.

Seferian-Jenkins bobbles the ball at the 1-yard line and subsequently re-controls the ball. The bobble makes the ball a “loose ball” under the rules. Any loose ball (which includes passes) follow the catch process to establish possession. It may seem like an arbitrary designation, but this is a clear way to bookend loose ball calls by keeping all loose balls consistent, no matter how they occur. Seferian-Jenkins is going to the ground as he regains control of the ball, and lands out of bounds in the end zone. This takes the ball, still considered loose, out of bounds in the end zone, which is a touchback and loss of possession.

It seems like a very harsh call to go against the offense, but this is consistent with all other rules regarding the end zone. This has been reviewed by the Competition Committee in the past, and they have deferred on making changes to an offensive fumble out of the end zone being ruled touchback.



http://www.footballzebras.com/2017/10/15/quick-calls-week-6-2017/

 

[maineman209]

That was a horrific call...come on man. Atlanta isn't invincible but they are going to just go off on O. Brady will need to be superman...then some.

Nope. Correct call by the replay officials. More than anything, I'm surprised that they got it right.

 

[cmasspatsfan]

I called the reversed Jets TD on the first replay before the review. The runner lost control of the ball before crossing the plane and didn't regain control until he was already out of bounds.

The officials' review replay simply verified the call.

The only "controversy" is whether Eagle and Fouts were being disingenuous or are really that stupid.

He's that stupid, he's the new Beasley Reece

 

[Tony2046]

Also the 2 defensive holding calls on running plays on the very same drive.

WTF were those calls? I've don't think I've ever seen that.

 

[Ring 6]

AT WORST, thats an incomplete pass call. The fact that the pats got possession of the ball is just an utter embarrassment. Having said that, its an officiating issue, not a patriots issue

What are you taking about? He ran like 9 steps after he caught the ball and before he FUMBLED.
you understand he FUMBLED right?
Do you know the rule of fumbling into and then out of the end zone?

 

[Deus Irae]

The defense played overall well.

 

[TommyD4207]

AT WORST, thats an incomplete pass call. The fact that the pats got possession of the ball is just an utter embarrassment. Having said that, its an officiating issue, not a patriots issue

Under no rules or parameters in the game of American Football at any level of competition, can that be considered an incomplete pass.

 

[Bartmac36]

The ball is clearly hanging in mid-air, possessed by nobody, as it breaks the plane.

Football Zebras:
Patriots at Jets (video). Jets tight end Austin Seferian-Jenkins scored what appeared to be a clear touchdown. On review, not only was the touchdown reversed, the ball went to the Patriots on a touchback.

Seferian-Jenkins bobbles the ball at the 1-yard line and subsequently re-controls the ball. The bobble makes the ball a “loose ball” under the rules. Any loose ball (which includes passes) follow the catch process to establish possession. It may seem like an arbitrary designation, but this is a clear way to bookend loose ball calls by keeping all loose balls consistent, no matter how they occur. Seferian-Jenkins is going to the ground as he regains control of the ball, and lands out of bounds in the end zone. This takes the ball, still considered loose, out of bounds in the end zone, which is a touchback and loss of possession.

It seems like a very harsh call to go against the offense, but this is consistent with all other rules regarding the end zone. This has been reviewed by the Competition Committee in the past, and they have deferred on making changes to an offensive fumble out of the end zone being ruled touchback.



http://www.footballzebras.com/2017/10/15/quick-calls-week-6-2017/

I dont give a flying f**k about any stupid breakdowns of the play, if you were a fan of any other team but the pats there is no chance you would think that was the right call..

 

[sambam94]

AT WORST, thats an incomplete pass call. The fact that the pats got possession of the ball is just an utter embarrassment. Having said that, its an officiating issue, not a patriots issue

incomplete? he ran with the ball forever..lol

 

[Tony2046]

Nope. Correct call by the replay officials. More than anything, I'm surprised that they got it right.

I know the rule but couldn't see whether he regained control before touching out of bounds or not.

 

[Deus Irae]

AT WORST, thats an incomplete pass call. The fact that the pats got possession of the ball is just an utter embarrassment. Having said that, its an officiating issue, not a patriots issue

One thing it 100% certainly was not is an incomplete pass.

Question the rule? Fair enough
Question whether there was sufficient evidence to overturn? Fair enough
Question whether it was a completion? You're out of your mind.

 

[maineman209]

He's that stupid, he's the new Beasley Reece

Controversy resolved!