- Joined
- Feb 23, 2005
- Messages
- 15,289
- Reaction score
- 24,900
You're definitely married."Wait until next year," the perennial loser's lament.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.You're definitely married."Wait until next year," the perennial loser's lament.
IF C Wallace is Starting at either Tackle Positions at the end of the year we did alright there.
You proud to have coined this phrase first?Two... Roger Rosengarten was starting for the Ravens. The Ravens and Chiefs were ranked #1 and #2 in the entire NFL in sacks last year. Both rookie tackles gave up one sack, but otherwise played great.
The notion that there were no tackles worth taking past the first round but Polk was apparently a first round talent is total horsesht.
There are new regime apologists who will be telling us for the next five years that we have to wait a little longer to be good.
"Wait until next year," the perennial loser's lament.
My definition of homer is someone that has unrealistic expectations about the team. They often defend what seem to be poor decisions by the team, and even worse, try to shut down or insult those who disagree. That's fine if you want to be that way, but you don't have license to tell anyone they aren't a fan just because you don't like what they say. I've been a Patriots fan for nearly 50 years. I am wrong about stuff all the time (most recently: I now think Polk will turn out to be a good possession WR, contrary to my assessment after the draft). Just give it a rest: fans can be overly critical, unrealistic, in between -- it's all good. There wouldn't be dynamic, interesting threads without diversity of opinion.Who cares if you're a "homer"? Homer is just an insult other sports media people use on other sports media people. If you're a fan of the team, you're expected to be one. In fact, if you aren't, you're not a fan of the team, by definition.
IMO it is clear that they drafted with a multi-year vision for the roster. They wanted to take a guy like Polk high because he has low bust potential and is someone they'll be able to count on as a likely starter for several years with Maye. They knew they'd be unlikely to start Maye this year at all, or at least, not for the first part of the season, so having a more shaky OL was not as big of a deal. They drafted a slightly more developmental tackle (Wallace) later to see if he could grow into a role over the course of the season. If they don't think he's capable of being the starting LT by next offseason, they could throw a high pick or cash at tackle next year. He'd most likely at least be ready to start at RT, which solves one problem.Two... Roger Rosengarten was starting for the Ravens. The Ravens and Chiefs were ranked #1 and #2 in the entire NFL in sacks last year. Both rookie tackles gave up one sack, but otherwise played great.
The notion that there were no tackles worth taking past the first round but Polk was apparently a first round talent is total horsesht.
There are new regime apologists who will be telling us for the next five years that we have to wait a little longer to be good.
"Wait until next year," the perennial loser's lament.
* InstafaceAs long as we are playing this game…. Bill Instagram Belichick shoukd have tajen Trent McDuffie (first team all pro) instead of Cole Strange
Meh, some is more useless than others. Complaining about contrafactual stuff is on the top of the list for me. More importantly, this isnt the first time a thread like this was createdSo is 98% of what's posted here including my response. The thread is fine, his emotional diatribe is over-the-top. But he's testing it out here to see if it will play on radio.
Sure, and it makes way more sense to create one thread about how this front office can't draft and developIsn’t the point that it didn’t have to be this way? Or are we just giving the front office a pass?
Bill Instagram Belichick is a new phenomenon that did not exist when that pick happened so that game doesn't work but nice try again.As long as we are playing this game…. Bill Instagram Belichick should have taken Trent McDuffie (first team all pro) instead of Cole Strange
That was an even bigger miss by the genius
Polker?This was a bad draft after the 3rd overall pick. We were basically playing Indian poker with how obvious our board was.
Two sort of. I think that Roger Rosengarten (the pick just before Suamataia) started or was playing for the Ravens; I don't know how he did, but he is a huge moose of a man. He may have been playing on the right, though and was born and bred to be a right tackleYou don’t have to sniff hard to smell the stink of our OL.
Despite the apologists saying there was absolutely no possibility of getting a LT that doesn’t rot, one appears on opening night that was there for the taking.
We definitely got tomahawked.Are my eyes playing tricks with me, or is rookie second round draft pick Kingsley Suamataia starting at Left Tackle for the Chiefs???? The Patriots could have taken him in round but took a possession WR in Polk instead. What was Patriots HQ thinking? Didn't they see the need for a LT? I can see where the Patriots might have chosen Polk over Adonai Mitchell, but it seems like a major whiff to pass on Suamataia. Not only did the Chiefs get Suamataia, but they also got the speedster Worthy. The rich get richer and the Patriots make pathetic personnel decisions.
This ^ is the worst Patriot's take in current rotation.IMO it is clear that they drafted with a multi-year vision for the roster. They wanted to take a guy like Polk high because he has low bust potential and is someone they'll be able to count on as a likely starter for several years with Maye. They knew they'd be unlikely to start Maye this year at all, or at least, not for the first part of the season, so having a more shaky OL was not as big of a deal. They drafted some a slightly more developmental tackle (Wallace) later to see if he could grow into a role over the course of the season. If they don't think he's capable of being the starting LT by next offseason, they could throw a high pick or cash at tackle next year. He'd most likely at least be ready to start at RT, which solves one problem.
They were locked into a WR in the second round (and a bunch of tackles had gone at the end of the first so maybe they didn’t think the value was there). I also think they thought they had taken care of LT for the short term with Chuks.
IF C Wallace is Starting at either Tackle Positions at the end of the year we did alright there.
Cole Strange was Instaface’s pickBill Instagram Belichick is a new phenomenon that did not exist when that pick happened so that game doesn't work but nice try again.
This is going to be a very very long season hopefully we can Trade the #1 overall for a haul. What's the record for sacks given up in a Season?? We are going come very close or smash it... I see why they're playing Onwenu at RT we are playing some killer Fronts this year with guys who can run circles around even him. There is no way this Team can survive with Lowe and Okorafor @ Tackle a DE's dream.This ^ is the worst Patriot's take in current rotation.
Making bad personnel decisions like Lowe/Okorafor is never in vogue, there is never a good time to bring bad players into your program.
There is no reason to sign bad free agents when better options are available at a similar price. There is never an excuse to chase after weapons and ignore the offensive line... if anything the opposite is true. Once you have your QB prospect build your lines, then chase weapons once you have the ability to block for them.
Long term vision... what part of signing sucky players fits into this vision? Just a terrible take... respectfully.
| 117 | 12K |
| 100 | 14K |
| 51 | 9K |
| 10 | 4K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 5 - April 20 (Through 26yrs)











