I thought kraft said yesterday , no likely extensions were happening in the middle of the season?Would not surprise me one bit now if by the next game we get an announcement for Hightower's extension
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I thought kraft said yesterday , no likely extensions were happening in the middle of the season?Would not surprise me one bit now if by the next game we get an announcement for Hightower's extension
hahahaha
Right but that means they keep their own and Seattle's 4th rounder.
...and that is why they traded him.If true, its pretty telling that collins is happy to be out of here.
Brady far outperforms his pay scale,not a realistic scenerio at this point as we all know he is vastly underpaid to what he does compared to some of the scrubs like Osweiller with that laughable 70 Mil contractBrady is another guy on the team. I will never understand why people think he is exempt from BB's system. When the cost outweighs the production, he is gone.
Hightower is the better, and considering his role in the locker room, the more important player. Just wish we could've kept them both this entire season. See no point in trading Collins for a low third/low fourth.Whenever I saw people ask "Collins or Hightower?", I'd always think of Collins' letdowns in big games (see: SuperBowl pass to Lynch to start final drive + Denver AFCCG TDs) although I still thought he was a hell of a player and would undoubtedly get re-signed and clean up his coverage game.
It wasn't by design, but when Jerod went down in '14, the defense really stepped up. They clearly felt the urgent need to pick up their alertness, their communication and their game, to make up for the loss.Not buying the initial takes that this is only about contract talks going south. If so, why burn the bridge now? I think Lombardi is hitting it closer:
michael lombardiVerified account?@mlombardifoxtv
Not surprised by the Pats trading Colllins. Not been playing well at all they need to get the defense fixed. This will get their attention
This is a Mankins or Milloy level move. Meant to send a message. The fact the return is apparently horrible is another matter.
I would assume "conditional" just means whether the Browns are assigned a third round comp pick or not. Every trade involving comp picks has to be conditional since they're not assigned yet.
Forget that BB is the HC for a second and then think about the trade in a vacuum instead of who gave it the okay and then try to tell me why it's a good dealIf it's the truth (and it is) then how is it a cop out? I defer to Belichick on all things football related. Just like I'd expect him to defer to me when it comes to electronic gadgets.
This is called maintaining salary cap discipline and keeping a 16 year dynasty going.
The only scenario under which I could remotely defend this trade is if Belichick sat down with Collins and afterwards came to the conclusion that this whole contract situation is hurting his motivation on the field....and that is why they traded him.
Forget that BB is the HC for a second and then think about the trade in a vacuum instead of who gave it the okay and then try to tell me why it's a good deal
Browns' new Front Office has been stellar. At least with the racking up pick and all. If they can get a good draft now and in 2018, they could become a good team for a change (Crazy)Right but that means they keep their own and Seattle's 4th rounder.
When was the last time the Patriots had $60M in free cap space?
| 10 | 610 |
| 1K | 37K |
| 2 | 865 |
| 4 | 1K |
| 23 | 4K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 4 - April 19 (Through 26yrs)











