Soliel
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2017
- Messages
- 4,806
- Reaction score
- 5,577
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I guess his MCL had nothing to do with it?
Honestly, I don't think it's that crazy.
The Bucs gave up #13 overall for a 27-year-old Darrell Revis (coming off a torn ACL) and then payed him $16M for the one season he played there.
Now let me be completely clear, I am absolutely, wholeheartedly against trading anything remotely close for that for Sherman, but that type of compensation wouldn't be unprecedented. There are a lot of parallels.
Was probably mostly made up from the start lol.
Right, the Pats won't do it (and I don't want them to). But if you're the Seahawks and setting the asking price for Sherman, you don't set your asking price based on what the frugal Patriots would be willing to offer, you set the asking price based on a pool of 31 teams being able to submit their best offer. It's not unreasonable to think that they would use Revis as a rough approximation/precedent.There is THE reason why the Bucs were the Bucs and the Pats are the Pats.
I don't think it's so convenient since other teams, like the Steelers, also were said to have withheld injury information. News of Sherman's MCL broke before all of the trade rumors. It broke before the season was even over. You are definitely welcomed to believe whatever you'd like or skew the narrative to fit your belief, and I'm seriously saying that and not being a smart ass, but understand it's speculation all the same (similar to your sentiment about how I'd feel if the Pats were doing it - how presumptuous of you). My viewpoint is likely speculation as well and neither one of us truly knows anything.Maybe him getting beat but not him losing his turn. Revis as great as he was just starting to decline by 29. I personally believe the reason seattle is shopping him is they know that his best years are behing him. I could be wrong. But if the pats were doing this to a player like sherman i would be positive and so would you. Also its a little convenient that he had an mcl injury that seattle didnt devulge during the season but now that the season is over, thats the reason why he played so bad and also we would like to trade him. Dont you think?
I don't think it's so convenient since other teams, like the Steelers, also were said to have withheld injury information. News of Sherman's MCL broke before all of the trade rumors. It broke before the season was even over. You are definitely welcomed to believe whatever you'd like or skew the narrative to fit your belief, and I'm seriously saying that and not being a smart ass, but understand it's speculation all the same (similar to your sentiment about how I'd feel if the Pats were doing it - how presumptuous of you). My viewpoint is likely speculation as well and neither one of us truly knows anything.
I hear you. We'll see what happens.Its a forum and thats what its for is conjecture and debate. I believe it is more likely than not sherman is on the decline. However, there is a very real possibility he was just hurt and he has another 3-4 years. Its all in good fun...not like I my feelings are involved..its just football talk. lol
PFF had him ranked 13th out of 111 CBs last year. He still picked off 4 INTs and only allowed 2 touchdowns. All of that was done while playing through a significant MCL injury. Some here are acting as if he still isn't one of the top CBs in the game, and I think that's silly.Yes, Sherman has likely declined from being one of the very best in the NFL. That doesn't mean that he can't become an integral part of the GILMORE-SHERMAN-ROWE troika.
After all, to fill this role, Sherman would be competing with Cyrus Jones and Coleman for that role.
People are only saying that simply because he isn't a Patriot. IF he does indeed end up a Patriot, watch how swiftly the tune will change!PFF had him ranked 13th out of 111 CBs last year. He still picked off 4 INTs and only allowed 2 touchdowns. All of that was done while playing through a significant MCL injury. Some here are acting as if he still isn't one of the top CBs in the game, and I think that's silly.
Thank you. The season he had was "drop off" for him but great for 90 percent of the other corners in the game. It's almost like if most other teams lose two in a row or start 2-2, nobody sounds the alarm. If NE stays 2-2, then "they're just not good anymore." It's an analysis based on an expectation. When if Sherman is in a decline, he's still better than 85-90 percent of the league.PFF had him ranked 13th out of 111 CBs last year. He still picked off 4 INTs and only allowed 2 touchdowns. All of that was done while playing through a significant MCL injury. Some here are acting as if he still isn't one of the top CBs in the game, and I think that's silly.
You sure about that? He's already 27.WRONG! Butler is better w/o question. Also has more upside. Butler has much better man cover skills, is much faster, much quicker, tougher, bettter tackler, can play otside and in the slot. sherman is not usually playing man. hes not patrick peterson. butler can do more things better, which makes him more valuable. The ideal scenario for any defense is still to have cbs in man coverage. They are more valuable than guys who thrive only in zones, simply because youre now freeing up defensive personnel to do other things.like passrush.
If both butler and sherman were ufa today, butler would be more coveted by more teamsand get a bigger contract.
Yep, and I'm pretty sure we could walk away after the 2017 season with a fairly minimal dead cap hit, if he had a bad year.Thank you. The season he had SAS "drop off" for him but great for 90 percent of the other corners in the game. It's almost like if most other teams lose two in a row or start 2-2, nobody sounds the alarm. If NE stays 2-2, then "they're just not good anymore." It's an analysis based on an expectation. When if Sherman is in a decline, he's still better than 85-90 percent of the league.
He won't listen to anything on this one. He's convinced and his evaluation is perfect. Butler is simply better and there's nothing to it... as far as he's concerned. He talks of Butler like he has zero weaknesses to his game and really has stopped just short of calling him the best in the game (I'm frankly shocked by that considering what I've been reading to this point). The guy went through the thread handing out 'disagrees' to every post that even slightly suggested Gilmore was better, even one's comparing physical make-up for crying out loud. LolYou sure about that? He's already 27.
Also, he's 5'10". This is like the "Isaiah Thomas is better than..." discussions from Celtics fans.
He tries really hard, and does lots of things well, but in the end, he's still 5'10".
You sure about that? He's already 27.
Also, he's 5'10". This is like the "Isaiah Thomas is better than..." discussions from Celtics fans.
He tries really hard, and does lots of things well, but in the end, he's still 5'10".
Most of the greatest cbs of all time were under 6'. There have been very few even good cbs at 6'1"" and up.