- Joined
- Oct 20, 2007
- Messages
- 29,801
- Reaction score
- 20,475
They paid a high price for a player that might have been straight release, so I don't see why you're arguing on this point. If the guy helps them win the Super Bowl, nobody's going to care what the cost was. If he busts, the cost will be noted repeatedly. And, with this sort of baggage-involved trade, that's how it should be.
Pretty much, this. I'm fine with the trade because I think that Talib has a good chance of being the sort of player that gets the Pats over the hump and makes them the favorite to go all the way. If he's able to play to the level that he's established in the Pats' defense, then he's exactly what we need.
That said, if the character concerns turn out to be even worse than I was aware of, then I will have been wrong, and Belichick too. Can't rule out the likelihood of that; happened with Haynesworth, and could happen here too.
Based on the likelihood that he flames out, plus the Bucs' desire to get rid of him, I think a 6th rounder or so would have been more reasonable, but the potential upside of the deal makes me not hate the trade as is. It was a steep price to pay for a guy whose bust potential is so high, but he has what we need, so so be it.
I also think that, if you wanted to, you could philosophically link this to the trade-ups for Jones and Hightower. The nature of the team is such that stockpiling picks and acquiring premium depth and camp competition is no longer the best way to make the team better. The Pats no longer lack those guys - what they lack now is premium talent, and today they got a premium talent for a 4th rounder. Hopefully it works out.
Last edited:












