FCB02062
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2010
- Messages
- 14,191
- Reaction score
- 12,656
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I am fairly sure that Araiza will be gone well before pick 170, let alone 183.I think this is capital to make trades on draft day and/or 100% chance that we draft the punter.
The rookie pool allocation is literally dependent on the picks a team makes in the draft (i.e., their rookie pool $ will go down because of this trade). Ironically, it has almost zero net effect on their actual salary cap room, because the signing bonuses for 183 + 245 are almost exactly equal to 170.Yeah, I think you are arguing against yourself .
I just think it has to do with the # of picks...the Texans will have too many guys taking up their rookie pool $$$ (Watson trade)...better to add UDFA's who don't count vs. the top 51 yet...
6th round picks are fairly worthless, nonsense trade.
I guess the draft can't come soon enough eh?
I wonder, now that Musk owns Twitter, if Brady's request to have this picture taken down will be accepted, or just retweeted over and over and over again. (this is a joke for those who take things too seriously)
From what I have read, Musk is buying it to have free speech. We will see. I am not much of a twitter person, so I don't really have a dog in the hunt.I wonder, now that Musk owns Twitter, if Brady's request to have this picture taken down will be accepted, or just retweeted over and over and over again. (this is a joke for those who take things too seriously)
The problem with Twitter is that the speech of the few becomes amplifiedFrom what I have read, Musk is buying it to have free speech. We will see. I am not much of a twitter person, so I don't really have a dog in the hunt.
That might be because, in the last 10 years, they've selected just 6 players in the fifth round, but 17 in the sixth round.Anecdotally, I feel like the Pats have as many 6th round contributors as they do 5th rounders. Either way, you're in the longshot or specialist territory by the time you hit the 5th round, so this is probably a wash. I think they like having picks as evenly spread as possible, and this accomplishes that. I'm not sure this is something to be excited or upset about it. It's a maneuvering play.
I don’t think they see a difference between late 5th and early 6th. They gained a player to move back and probably take the same guy they would taken any way.Pats have had decent success in the 5th round with STers and OLs
Bailey
Bentley
Cardona
Cannon
Mesko
Slater
Koppen
Historically they seemed to double up in the 4th and 6th round. I wonder why they don't like the 5th rd? They've had good success.
The problem is people take it seriously. It’s amazing that we really have created a belief that we have to stop people from speaking out of fear of what they say.The problem with Twitter is that the speech of the few becomes amplified
| 9 | 2K |
| 11 | 357 |
| 0 | 435 |
| 122 | 7K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 2 - April 17 (Through 26yrs)











