meatface
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2012
- Messages
- 5,378
- Reaction score
- 3,451
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Looked like a lot of empty seats today. What do you think it was?The NFL is...weird this year
Looked like a lot of empty seats today. What do you think it was?
Hard to imagine someone from the West failing to step up and finish at 12-4 or so. Even Pittsburgh in the North has a pretty easy schedule. It's certainly not the South that I'd be worried about.IMO, the only team that will be battling us for the #1 seed is whoever wins the AFC South.
AFC North winner ceiling is 11 games, AFC South 10 games, maaaybe 11.
It will then come down to the Raiders/Chiefs/Broncos, who hopefully beat up on each-other.
Looked like a lot of empty seats today. What do you think it was?
Looked like a lot of empty seats today. What do you think it was?
Half the people in our section left beginning of 4th due to heat...our entire row was almost empty for GW
Absolutely brutal in the seats. Lost interest in drinking beer because of saving room for waterHalf the people in our section left beginning of 4th due to heat...our entire row was almost empty for GW
"National anthem protests were the top reason that NFL fans watched fewer games last season, according to a new survey released by J.D. Power.
The pollster said it asked more than 9,200 people who attended either one football, basketball or hockey game whether they tuned into fewer games and why. Twenty-six percent of those who watched fewer games last season said that national anthem protests, some of which were led by Colin Kaepernick, were the reason.
After that, 24 percent of those surveyed who said they watched fewer games said they did so either because of the league's off-the-field image issues with domestic violence or with game delays, including penalties.
One in five (20 percent) listed excessive commercials and advertising as a reason, something the NFL is seeking to address by moving around traditional ad blocks."
-espn.com; July 27, 2017
Ratings dipped again on Sunday. Sunday Night Football’s Packers-Falcons game was down 8 percent from last season and 23 percent from 2015. The curious thing about these dips is that the number of people viewing games is not down, but the amount of time they’re watching for is. Unless “only watching part of a game” is a new form of political boycott, that reasoning for the ratings drop doesn’t hold much water. (Yes, we have a year’s worth of data noting that people say they are tuning out because of boycotts. But we have roughly 200,000 years of data suggesting that what people say and what they do are often two entirely different things.)
as we didPackers and Falcons came damn close to losing.
Cross the ravens off the list.
Yeah except people are lying in that survey. If you look at the raw data, the total number of people watching the NFL hasn't really changed. It's just the amount of time they watch per game that's down.
If you are talking about Gillette, it was the heat. It was unbearable. A lot of folks were in the shaded concourse or the clubs just to get out of the sun, but it was full.Looked like a lot of empty seats today. What do you think it was?